Even My Dr. Doesn't understand this problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ghassan99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    even
AI Thread Summary
To determine a voltage to within one part in 300, the required accuracy of the meter is approximately 0.33%. The discussion highlights the confusion regarding the expectation for a doctor to understand technical specifications related to voltage meters. The calculation clarifies that "one part in 300" translates to an accuracy of 0.00333 or 1/3 of one percent. The emphasis is on the importance of precise measurements in technical fields. Understanding these specifications is crucial for accurate readings in various applications.
Ghassan99
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Even My Dr. Doesn't understand this problem !

It's is desired to determine a voltage to within one part in 300.what accuracy of the meter is required?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


Why would you expect your Dr. to know about a voltage meter? "One part in 300" is 1/300= 0.003333333... or 1/3 of one percent. That is the accuracy.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top