Every finite subgroup of isometries of n-dimensional space

Battousii
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
... fixes at least one point.

I recently came upon the proof in a book and I didn't quite understand the notion of "rigid motion", and I was wondering if you could help clarify it for me. Is it just "the vertices must stay in the given order", as used in symmetries of polygons? I've attached the proof.

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Rigidmotion.jpg
    Rigidmotion.jpg
    20.2 KB · Views: 468
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A "rigid motion" is also called an isometry. An isometry is a function f:\mathbb{R}^n \mapsto \mathbb{R}^n so that |\bold{x}-\bold{y}| = |f(\bold{x}) - f(\bold{y})|. Where | \ | is the Euclidean metric. All this means it is a function such that the distance between any two points remains the same after the function is performed. Thus, in a sense it is "rigid", i.e. it leaves the object in tact. So reflections, rotations, translations are simple examples of functions which leave objects unchanged.

Given a set (or an object) in space a "symettry" is a rigid motion which leaves the object unchanged, i.e. it is its own image under the map. In that case we can define a "symettery group" on an object as the set of all symettries on the object.

I think what you are trying to prove is that the group of symettries on a finite set is either the dihedral group or a cyclic group.
 
Alright, thank you. That makes sense. Basically, a rigid motion will preserve distances and angles (in terms of vectors).

Can you clarify what it means when the Orthogonal group, O(n), fixes the origin?
 
Last edited:
It means every isometry in O(n) leaves 0 fixed. The elements of O(n) aren't 'vectors' - they're maps/matrices.
 
What they are saying in the book is this:

Let G be your finite group of isometries/rigid motions on a vector space V. Let v ∈ V be arbitrary. Define

w := \frac{1}{G} \sum_{g \in G} g(v)

now for any h ∈ G, we have h(w)=w:

h(w) = h\left( \frac{1}{G} \sum_{g \in G} g(v) \right) = \frac{1}{G} \sum_{g \in G} hg(v) = w

The second equality holds because (I think) an isometry of a Hilbert space is automatically an affine map (it maps affine combinations to affine combinations, and our sum there is an affine combination since the coefficients sum to 1).

The last equality holds because multiplication with a group element is bijective, so it is the same sum, just reordered.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top