Excitation by photons smaller than energy interval

osturk
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi people,

Time-dependent perturbation theory allows for transitions to excited states, through a sinusoidal perturbation whose frequency is smaller than the energy difference between the states. (That is, P_{a \rightarrow b}=\frac{sin^{2}[(\omega_{0}-\omega)t/2]}{(\omega_{0}-\omega)^2}. Although the transition probability falls rapidly, as incident light frequency falls below the natural frequency, it's still non-zero..)

So in the "rare" event of absorption of a photon with insufficient energy, where does the lacking energy come from? Can you comment on the energy conservation in such an event?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Messiah discusses this in Chap XVII, and there he points out that the nonconservation of energy is only apparent, since it is the unperturbed energy (the energy difference between the original states) which is not conserved, rather than the total energy of the system including the perturbation.
 
thanks for the answer. I only have the 1st volume of Messiah's book, and a google search on the issue returns nothing, so..

Bill_K said:
... nonconservation of energy is only apparent, since it is the unperturbed energy (the energy difference between the original states) which is not conserved, rather than the total energy of the system including the perturbation.

But, the total energy of the system seems to be increased already.. initially we have a photon with \hbar\omega, and then, a system with energy \hbar\omega_{0}, but no photon. surely energy should be conserved, but how is it compensated?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top