Exercise 2.5 in Misner, Thorne and Wheeler

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TerryW
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exercise Wheeler
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In Exercise 2.5 of Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler, the squared length of a 4-velocity, denoted as u, is established to be -1. The discussion highlights a confusion regarding the component v0 = 0 and the derived spacelike vector v, which is expressed as v = γ(-u2, -u1, -u2, -u3). This vector does not maintain the squared length of -1, indicating a distinction between the 4-velocity and the spacelike vector. Clarification on the special nature of v is essential for understanding its derivation and implications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 4-velocity in the context of special relativity
  • Familiarity with the concept of spacelike and timelike vectors
  • Knowledge of the Lorentz factor (γ) and its application
  • Basic grasp of the equations presented in Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler's "Gravitation"
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of 4-velocity and its properties in special relativity
  • Explore the implications of spacelike vectors in Minkowski space
  • Investigate the role of the Lorentz factor (γ) in relativistic transformations
  • Review Exercise 2.5 in Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on general relativity and spacetime concepts, will benefit from this discussion.

TerryW
Gold Member
Messages
234
Reaction score
22
If the squared length of a 4-velocity is -1, how can you have a component v0 =0?

I've played with equation (2.35) and produced a result of v = γ(-u2, -u1, -u2, -u3), which doesn't have a squared length of -1.

Can anyone help out?



TerryW
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In Exercise 2.5, u is the particle's 4-velocity with squared length -1, whereas v is a newly defined spacelike vector, apparently the projection of u onto the observer's space section.
 
Thanks

Hi Bill_K,


So my result is probably OK. A few words along those lines in the text hinting at the special nature of v might have helped, it does come out of left field a bit.

Thanks for your prompt reply. You obviously don't subscribe to the view I saw in one post that if you are working through MTW, you should need any help!


Regards

TerryW
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K