Expanding the electromagnetic hamiltonian

xahdoom
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This isn't a homework problem - I can't understand a particular statement in my professor's notes. As such, I hope it's in the correct forum.

Homework Statement



The Hamiltonian for a charged particle in a potential field A is

\hat{H} = (1/2m) ( -i \hbar \nabla - q A)^{2}

The square bracket can be expanded.

Homework Equations



In my professor's notes, this expands to \hat{H} = (1/2m) ( -\hbar^{2}\nabla^{2} + q^{2}A^{2} + 2 q i \hbar A\bullet \nabla + q i \hbar ( \nabla \bullet A )

The Attempt at a Solution



When I attempt the expansion myself, I don't get the factor of 2 present in the 3rd term of the expansion. I know that it must be there - subsequent proofs using the Landau gauge don't work without it - but I don't understand where it came from.

Any help in understanding the reasoning behind this would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Always be careful when you have an operator like the gradient operator. It is not meaningful to just expand out the binomial product and write A\cdot \nabla, because that must be acting on something. So the way to expand the Hamiltonian is to write it acting on a wavefunction, \hat{H}f = \frac{1}{2m} (-i \hbar \nabla - q\vec{A})^2 f; if you do that, you'll see where the factor of 2 came from (if you correctly apply the product rule).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top