Expansion of a basketball with temperature

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the effects of temperature on the volume of a basketball, initially at 298 K, as it heats up to 309 K. The key point is whether the basketball can expand; if it cannot, its volume remains constant. If it can expand, the Ideal Gas Law applies, but the pressure and number of moles must be considered, complicating the calculation. The conversation highlights the confusion regarding the relationship between pressure, volume, and temperature, as well as the real-world elasticity of the basketball's material. Ultimately, the problem lacks additional complexity, leading to further confusion among participants.
BittersweetLove
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Another problem with an equation I don't know.I'm sooo going to fail this test if I don't get some help...


A basketball with a volume of 4.75 Liters is left in a car when the temperature is 298 K. What will the volume of the ball be as the car heats up to 309 K during the day?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's not a very well-stated question. The answer depends whether the ball can expand or is rigid. And if it can expand, it depends on whether the car windows are open, etc.

Assume it can't expand, then the volume is the same, right? Assume it can expand per the Ideal Gas Law -- write out that equation and solve it for us to check your work.
 
I'm a bit confused because isn't the Ideal Gas Law equation

Pressure (x) Volume = # of moles (x) 0.0821 atm (x) Temperature?

If I do that equation, I have the volume and temperature, but what about the pressure and moles? I don't even know how I would find mol in the problem.
 
The number of moles inside the closed basketball is constant. The pressure, however, goes to my objection about the problem statement. If the ball is rigid, the pressure increases and the volume does not. If the ball is flacid, the volume changes and the pressure does not. In the real world, the ball's walls have an elastic constant, and the expansion of the ball does work against this spring action.

So the simplistic answer would be to hold P and n constant, anc calculate the change in V from the change in T (remember to use absolute temp). But that is so simplistic, that there must be more to the problem statement, it would seem...
 
There's no more to it. Promise. Maybe if there were, I wouldn't be so confused. lol.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top