Expectation value of potential energy of Ideal gas

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the expectation value of potential energy for a column of gas influenced by gravity. The original poster presents the potential energy formula and seeks to determine the appropriate distribution function for the gas in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to identify the correct distribution function for potential energy, considering the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution and questioning its applicability. They express uncertainty about using a derived pressure function based on kinetic energy.
  • Some participants suggest examining how pressure varies with height and emphasize the need for equilibrium conditions in the gas column.
  • There are discussions about the relationship between pressure and density, and the implications of temperature constancy in the context of potential energy averaging.
  • One participant notes the need to derive pressure as a function of height independently, without relying on atmospheric conditions.
  • Concerns are raised about the distinction between pressure and the distribution function, with a focus on integrating potential energy with respect to the distribution.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various approaches being explored. Participants are questioning assumptions and clarifying concepts related to pressure and potential energy. There is no explicit consensus yet, but some productive directions have been suggested regarding the relationship between pressure and potential energy integration.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes a constraint that the solution should not rely on known atmospheric conditions, which adds complexity to the problem. There is also a mention of the equipartition theorem as a potential avenue for exploration.

Guffie
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Say you have a large column of gas with insulating walls standing on the Earth's surface, which is L high and at room temperature (25degC) at the interface of the surface and column. Assuming the potential energy on the gas is only duel to gravity, U = mgx where x is the altitude of the gas, what's the expectation value of the potential energy?

Homework Equations



U = mgx
<f(x)> = int_{a,b} P(x) f(x) dx where P(x) is the distribution function

The Attempt at a Solution



I am having trouble finding the correct distribution function for the potential energy.

I thought it would be the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, but that is only in terms of momentum and velocity really,

There is a distribution for Energy itself but I'm not sure that it what I should be using?

Could anyone point me to the correct distribution function for this question?

After finding it the answer is just

<U>=mg int_{0,10} P(x) x dx

Right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know how pressure depends on the height?
Hint: every part of the column has to be in an equilibrium of forces.

Pressure and density are proportional to each other (for an ideal gas).
 
Sorry, i should have also noted that the question states "don't base your solution from already known knowledge of the conditions of the Earth's atmosphere."

I have going with this distribution function so far..

c7bd5e6b3a5796aeaa091de2c7a6987b.png


but it was derived using p^2 = 2mE, which is the kinetic energy..

To answer your questin,

p = p0e^(-Cx/T0) where C = gM/R, M being the molar mass of dry air and R the gas constant.

which is also the pressure inside the column (but i think I'm supposed to stick to the general distribution function method)

Also, when the entire system is at equilibrium that implies that dT = 0, i.e. the temperature and hence the kinetic energy/velocity are constant right?

Sorry, I'm having trouble seeing how this will relate to the averaged potential energy (mgx)
I'm not sure if we're supposed to be using this result for the pressure of the Earth's atmosphere, i think we're supposed to just integrate U P(x), but I'm not 100% sure what the P(x) will be here

edit:
i think I'm going to have to use the equipartition theorem,
 
Last edited:
Guffie said:
Sorry, i should have also noted that the question states "don't base your solution from already known knowledge of the conditions of the Earth's atmosphere."
=> you have to calculate pressure as function of height yourself.
I don't think the velocity distribution helps here.

p = p0e^(-Cx/T0) where C = gM/R, M being the molar mass of dry air and R the gas constant.
That looks like a good approach.

Also, when the entire system is at equilibrium that implies that dT = 0, i.e. the temperature and hence the kinetic energy/velocity are constant right?
Right

Sorry, I'm having trouble seeing how this will relate to the averaged potential energy (mgx)
I'm not sure if we're supposed to be using this result for the pressure of the Earth's atmosphere, i think we're supposed to just integrate U P(x), but I'm not 100% sure what the P(x) will be here
P(x) allows to calculate rho(x), and this gives the total potential energy of the column via an integration.

edit:
i think I'm going to have to use the equipartition theorem,
?
 
sorry I am pretty sure i can't use this result in answering the question,

p = p0e^(-Cx/T_0)

I think maybe you may have mixed up p the pressure and P(x) the distribution, which is what i was trying to find

what i have been looking for was this

<U> = (int_{-∞,∞} int_{0,10} dp dx U e^(-β E(p,x) )/Z

Z being the partition function, int_{-∞,∞} int_{0,10} dp dx e^(-β E(p,x)
 
P(x) and p(x) are proportional to each other, they just differ by some normalization factor.

I am quite sure that thermodynamics beyond the ideal gas law is not required (or useful).
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K