Expectation value of z component of angular momentum for a particle on a ring

rmjmu507
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I have to find the expectation value of the z component of the angular momentum for a particle on a ring and the expectation value of the z component of the angular momentum squared for a particle on a ring.

The wavefunction is e^((± imx))

I've determined that the expectation value for the z component is -\hbar/m and that the expectation value for the square of the z component is \hbar squared over m squared.

This would mean that the uncertainty in the z component of the angular momentum for a particle on a ring is 0.

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, the angular momentum should come out as proportional to m. You have to calculate the average value of L_z in this way:

<br /> \langle L_z \rangle = \int \psi^* \hat{L}_z \psi~d\tau<br />

where \tau stands for the coordinates of the particle. On a circle, the position of particle is given by just one coordinate, usually angle. Let us denote it by \varphi. It takes values from 0 to 2\pi. In this coordinate, the operator of angular momentum is given by

<br /> \hat{L}_z = i\hbar \frac{\partial }{\partial \varphi}<br />

Tha last thing you need is the wave function. You gave e^{im\varphi}, but this is not correct wave function because it is not normalized.

The correct function has to satisfy

<br /> \int_0^{2\pi} \psi^* \psi ~d\varphi = 1,<br />

so you will have to change your function little bit.
 
I get

\frac{1}{2π}\int(-i\hbar/im) d\varphi which, integrated over 0 to 2π yields -\hbar/m

following the same procedure, I find the expectation of L_{z}^{2} is -\hbar^{2}/m^{2}

Still the same result
 
How did you get m into denominator?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top