Expectation Values of x & p for Wavefunction u(x,0)

Geocentric
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle is represented(at t=0) by the wavefunction

u(x,0) = A(a^2 - x^2) if -a<x<a
= 0 otherwise
Determine <x> & <p>.
It is given in the book that in this case <p> \neq m*d/dt<x>. Could someone please tell me the reason for this?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
because if you use <p> = m d<x>/dt, you would determine the expectation value of the momentum via that of x.
But <p> is given only by ∫u p u* dx - it's a definition.
 
Last edited:
Rick88 said:
because if you use <p> = m d<x>/dt, you would determine the expectation value of the momentum via that of x.
But <p> is given only by ∫u p u* dx - it's a definition.

What I don't understand is that according to Ehrenfest theorem,
<p> = m* d/dt<x>
Why is this not true in this case?
 
How does your book DEFINE p mathematically?
 
The integral is just the definition of <p>.
p and <p> are not the same thing, so you can't use the formula for p to find <p>.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top