Expected value for momentum and x, intro to quantum mechanics.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the expected momentum <p> and position <x> for a free particle in quantum mechanics. The user attempts to derive <p> using the wavefunction Ψ(x, t=0) = ψ(x) exp(ikx) but struggles with the integration process and the application of complex conjugates. Feedback emphasizes the importance of using the complex conjugate of the wavefunction and clarifies that the integral involving the derivative of ψ should not be simplified prematurely. The user expresses uncertainty about their calculations and seeks guidance on finding <x> as a function of time. Overall, the conversation highlights common challenges in applying quantum mechanics principles to solve problems.
scottyavh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider first a free particle (Potential energy zero everywhere). When the particle at
a given time is prepared in a state ψ (x) it has

<x> = 0 and <p> = 0.

The particle is now prepared in Ψ (x, t = 0) = ψ (x) exp (ikx)

Give <p> at time t = 0.

It can be shown that in quantum mechanics <p> is independent of time for a free
particle, in analogy to Newton’s first law in classical mechanics. Give <x> as a
function of time.

Homework Equations


<p> = \int\Psi*(-i\hbard/dx)\Psidx (Should be a partial derivative
I just don't know how to write that, also integral is from -infinity to +infinity, same for all
I write further down too)

The Attempt at a Solution


The attempt at a solution:

Basically substituting straight into the equation I gave above:

<p> = ∫ψ(x)exp(-ikx).-i\hbar.d/dx[ψ(x)exp(ikx)]dx

I guessed that I have to use the product rule for the second half of that so I get:

<p> = ∫ψ(x)exp(-ikx).-i\hbar.dψ(x)/dx.exp(ikx)]dx+∫ψ(x)exp(-ikx).-i\hbar.ψ(x)ik.exp(ikx)]dx

This is where my complete lack of experience shows if not already. Simplifying the first integral, the exponents add to zero for the exp() terms so they cancel. Also, dψ/dx.dx can be simplified to dψ. This leaves the term in the fist integral as -i\hbarψ.dψ.

Simplifying the term in the second integral I use the same exponent rule to cancel those and also --i.i = 1. That leaves, in the second integral, the term \hbarkψ2dx.

I've been doing educated guessing up to here but now I really start guessing.
I have:

<p> = -i\hbar∫ψ(x)dx+\hbark∫ψ2(x)dx

And by some math voodoo and because I saw somewhere that the integral of psi2dx = 1, I get zero for the first integral and <p> = \hbark. I suspect I am wrong at many different points for so many different reasons. I hope this doesn't hurt too many people reading it.

As for the second part, finding <x> as a function of t, I have no idea where to start so even a pointer or two would be appreciated for that. If anyone could point out the numerous mistakes that are no doubt in my attempt at the first part I would also be very grateful. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hey, welcome to physicsforums!
You've got it mostly right. But you need to remember that ψ (x) is a complex number generally, so when you take the complex conjugate of the full wavefunction, this bit is going to become its complex conjugate too. And that is how you get psi2dx in the second integral. (Because this is psi times its complex conjugate, not squared).

Also, in the first integral, you got to ∫ψ(x).-iℏ.dψ(x)/dx.dx and then you wrote it as -iℏψ.dψ which is fine, but then you never showed why this is zero. To be honest, I don't think it helps to re-write it as -iℏψ.dψ And instead, you should leave it as ∫ψ(x).-iℏ.dψ(x)/dx.dx (again, the psi on the left should actually be the complex conjugate). But anyway, if you look at this integral, then think: does it relate to an expectation value of psi ? (Maybe you realized this and didn't remember to write it down, but it is the key step!)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top