Expected value of variance of Hamiltonian in coherent states

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the expected value of the variance of energy in coherent states, specifically addressing challenges with non-hermitian and non-commutative raising and lowering operators. Participants are unsure about their calculations of <H>² and <H²>, seeking clarification on the correct approach. A solution involving the commutation relation between the operators is proposed, and feedback indicates that the approach appears valid. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying operator algebra in quantum mechanics. Clear steps for resolving the calculations are requested to identify any potential mistakes.
graviton_10
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Find the variance of the energy in coherent state |ɑ>.
Relevant Equations
<ΔH> = <ɑ| HH |ɑ>
I am trying to find the expected value of the variance of energy in coherent states. But since the lowering and raising operators are non-hermitian and non-commutative, I am not sure if I am doing it right. I'm pretty sure my <H>2 calculation is right, but I'm not sure about <H2> calculation.

Here is my solution:
 

Attachments

  • WhatsApp Image 2023-02-25 at 3.08.54 AM.jpeg
    WhatsApp Image 2023-02-25 at 3.08.54 AM.jpeg
    53.6 KB · Views: 146
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1677335473758.png


Check the step circled in orange. ##a^\dagger## and ##a## don't commute.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Terrakron
Yes, but how to do it the right way?
 
graviton_10 said:
Yes, but how to do it the right way?
Please post the steps for how you reduced ##\langle \alpha | (a^{\dagger} a)^2|\alpha \rangle## to ##|\alpha^*\alpha|^2 \langle \alpha | \alpha \rangle##. That way, we can help you see where you made a mistake.
 
So, I used the fact that the commutator of a and a dagger is 1. Does it look good now?
 

Attachments

  • WhatsApp Image 2023-02-27 at 2.51.33 PM.jpeg
    WhatsApp Image 2023-02-27 at 2.51.33 PM.jpeg
    56 KB · Views: 110
That looks good.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top