Expert Help with Integration: Understanding the Area Under a Graph

  • Thread starter Thread starter liz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intergration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding integration, specifically in the context of finding the area under a graph. Participants express varying levels of familiarity with the concept and seek clarification on its fundamental principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of integration, including its relationship to Riemann sums and the concept of limits. Some mention approximations for integration, such as the trapezium rule, while others explore the theoretical underpinnings of integrals.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes multiple perspectives on integration, with some participants providing insights into its mathematical foundations and others questioning the assumptions behind various methods. There is an ongoing exploration of different ways to conceptualize and approximate integration.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note potential confusion regarding terminology, such as the spelling of "integration," and the relationship between delta and derivative notation. The discussion also reflects a range of prior knowledge among participants, impacting the depth of explanations offered.

liz
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
URGENT help with intergration

im doing some coursework where I am investigating ways of finding the area under a graph and i don't really understand intergration. please could someone explain it really thoroughly, id really appreciate it. thank you in advance to anyone who can help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
liz said:
im doing some coursework where I am investigating ways of finding the area under a graph and i don't really understand intergration. please could someone explain it really thoroughly, id really appreciate it. thank you in advance to anyone who can help.

Well, integration (between two integration-boundaries a and b where a<b) really calculates the area under a given curve f(x). The start and end-point are the boundaries.

\int_{a}^{b} f(x)dx really means that you sum up (denoted by the integration sign, which is the continuous variant of the sigma-sommation sign) the surface of little rectangles. The f(x) denotes the height and the differential dx denotes the width. So f(x)*dx really is the surface, you see?

This is in easy language the signification of an integral in one dimension. Mathematically all of this is formalised using Darboux-sums for the Riemann-integral. You can also use measure-theory to introduce the concept of integrals, which is then called the Lebesgue integral

You know, that integration is the opposite of derivation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_integral
regards
marlon
 
Last edited:
An integral is a Riemann sum with the limit taken to infinite, (or dx-> 0). What it does is it makes little rectangles of width Delta X and height f(x) throughout an interval a to b. The sum of these rectangles approximates the area underneath, and as the number of rectangles goes to infinite, the sum becomes exact.

Taking the limit of the riemann sum turns it into an integral ( I believe ).
 
whozum said:
Taking the limit of the riemann sum turns it into an integral ( I believe ).

Conceptually, the integral really denotes the summation.

It's the theory of Darboux sums and their minor and major rectangles of which the difference in area must evolve towards zero, that formally describe the theory begind integrals

regards
marlon
 
liz said:
im doing some coursework where I am investigating ways of finding the area under a graph and i don't really understand intergration. please could someone explain it really thoroughly, id really appreciate it. thank you in advance to anyone who can help.
Could you not say that \int_{a}^{b} y dx \approx \ \frac{1}{2} h [(y_0 \ + \ y_n) \ + \ 2(y_1 \ + \ y_2 \ + \ ... \ y_{n-1})] \ ,when \ h = \frac{b - a}{n} ?

This will show you can approximate integration even if you don't know what it is.

The Bob (2004 ©)
 
The Bob said:
This will show you can approximate integration even if you don't know what it is.

The Bob (2004 ©)
No, because how do you think this formula was constructed in the first place ?

marlon
 
And one more thing for liz

INTEGRATION (from integer) (integral) and not intergration (as in inter grating)...:wink:

At least the name get it right...

Daniel.
 
So critical. :)
 
I suggest going to www.mathworld.com and typing in some of the keywords used in the replies. Specifically look up "Riemann Sum", "Integration" (at least on of these links will give you a brief history), and click on some of the links at the bottom of the page that catch your fancies.
 
  • #10
thank you everyone for your help. and yes i know that it's spelt integration, i just put an extra r in automatically.


The Bob said:
Could you not say that \int_{a}^{b} y dx \approx \ \frac{1}{2} h [(y_0 \ + \ y_n) \ + \ 2(y_1 \ + \ y_2 \ + \ ... \ y_{n-1})] \ ,when \ h = \frac{b - a}{n} ?

This will show you can approximate integration even if you don't know what it is.

The Bob (2004 ©)

isnt that formula that Bob sugested the trapezium rule?
anyway thank you i am very grateful for the help form everyone.
 
  • #11
Yes, there are many ways to estimate an area.
 
  • #12
If you have any programming experience this might help. I used to think of it as a loop. Where the loop has a starting condition of A, and a stopping condition at B. Thus when you integrate a function from A to B, you are actually in a loop from A to B and the body of the loop (what its doing) is simply adding up every point the function "hits". The loop doesn't increment with integers though, instead it increments with infintesimals (really really tiny lengths). Thinking of it "looping with infintesimals" also will help you to remember the dx in the integration notation with a problem like \int_{A}^{B} x^2 \,dx.


I hope that doens't confuse you more. It is obviously not a thourough explanation, but you can find that, at many places on the internet. mathworld is an excellent place.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
hey I've just been reading a pure maths textbook and it says at one point (i hope your familiar with integration stuff so i don't need to put all of it): from the definition, delta A / delta x tends to the derivative dA / dx. i know that delta means "an increase in ...", and d is used to mean "a change in ..." so what does that mean?
 
  • #14
Delta A / Delta X tends to dA/dX as Delta X goes to 0.

delta X = x_2-x_1, the difference between two points, so if you think of a curve and a secant line drawn between any two points, as the secant line connects two points that are closer and closer together the line approaches the tangent line.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
972
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K