Expert Tips for Choosing a Durable Hammock: Tight vs. Sagging Tension

Thread starter cutie05
Start date Feb 24, 2006
Tags

Vectors

AI Thread Summary

A tightly stretched hammock is generally more likely to break than one that sags, as the increased tension can exceed the material's strength limits. Sagging hammocks distribute weight more evenly, reducing stress on any single point. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering the hammock's material and construction when evaluating durability. Participants are encouraged to share their experiences and reasoning to deepen the understanding of tension effects. Proper tension management is crucial for ensuring safety and longevity in hammock use.

Feb 24, 2006

cutie05

Which is more likely to break, a hammock strecthed tightly between a pair of trees or one that sags more when you sit on it?

Physics news on Phys.org

Feb 24, 2006

dicerandom

Again, please show us what you have done to try and start the problem or what your thinking is. We can't just do the problem for you.

Please read the https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=94379 at the top of this forum.

Thread 'I've come across another fluid pressure problem I don't understand'

Neglect gravity other than that of water; neglect friction. F1=ρgsh=1000*10*1*(1+4)=50000 N; F1=ρgsh=1000*10*0.1*4=4000 N; F3=50000-4000=46000 N?

View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

View full post »

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

View full post »