Explaining the Equation: ½ mu2 = ½ mv2 + ½ ms2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Disputationem
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the equation ½ mu² = ½ mv² + ½ ms², which is related to the conservation of energy in elastic collisions, particularly involving particles of equal mass. Participants are seeking clarity on the derivation and meaning of the terms within the equation, especially the term ½ ms².

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express confusion about the derivation of the equation and the role of the term ½ ms². Some attempt to relate it to kinetic energy before and after collisions, while others question the interpretation of 's' as speed rather than acceleration.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the equation's components, with some participants providing insights into the conservation of energy and momentum. However, no consensus has been reached regarding the interpretation of the terms, and multiple perspectives are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the context of elastic collisions and the assumption that the involved particles have equal mass, while also noting the potential for confusion regarding the symbols used in the equation.

Disputationem
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
I have no idea how this equation (½ mu^2 = ½ mv^2 + ½ ms^2 ) came to be. I understand that work done is equal to final kinetic energy minus initial (w = KE_v - KE_u) but I have no idea how the "1/2 ms^2" portion came to be. Is there anyone that can help me on explaining why the equation is in this manner?
Relevant Equations
½ mu^2 = ½ mv^2 + ½ ms^2 , w = KE_v - KE_u.
My attempt is that I think that, since the equation was derived in an interaction between particles (proving that the angle between the subsequent paths of both particles must be 90 degrees), that acceleration (in m/s^2) is basically negligable since it is so small that it could be rounded off to 0. However, I'm unsure about the validity of this theory, so I would like an explanation for why ½ mu2 = ½ mv2 + ½ ms2 is the way it is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
May I understand your case that energy and velocity of the body we are watching is before collision
KE_u=\frac{1}{2}mv^2
and after collision
KE_v=\frac{1}{2}mu^2
and s is speed of another body of same mass that I assume it has been at still but starts moving collided by the body mentioned above ?
 
The final terms
Disputationem said:
Homework Statement:: I have no idea how this equation (½ mu^2 = ½ mv^2 + ½ ms^2 ) came to be. I understand that work done is equal to final kinetic energy minus initial (w = KE_v - KE_u) but I have no idea how the "1/2 ms^2" portion came to be. Is there anyone that can help me on explaining why the equation is in this manner?
Relevant Equations:: ½ mu^2 = ½ mv^2 + ½ ms^2 , w = KE_v - KE_u.

My attempt is that I think that, since the equation was derived in an interaction between particles (proving that the angle between the subsequent paths of both particles must be 90 degrees), that acceleration (in m/s^2) is basically negligable since it is so small that it could be rounded off to 0. However, I'm unsure about the validity of this theory, so I would like an explanation for why ½ mu2 = ½ mv2 + ½ ms2 is the way it is.
Aplologies if I'm wrong, but from your wording, it seems like you believe the term "½ ms^2” is a value of acceleration. (a=0.5 m/s²).

This would not make sense because you can’t add an acceleration to an energy.

To make sense, ‘s’ needs to be the symbol for the speed of some object. (It's a bad choice of a symbol for speed though!)

For example, the equation would be valid in this situation:

Particle A (mass m, speed u) collides elastically with particle B (mass m, stationary). After the collision A's speed is v and B’s speed is s.

Since kinetic energy is conserved in elastic collisions:
½mu² = ½mv² + ½ms²
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Disputationem
[moved my response here from the other thread]
Disputationem said:
I never understood why the equation was ½ mu2 = ½ mv2 + ½ ms2 in the first place. I understand the mu and mv portion, but I don't quite understand the ms part of the equation. What is it derived from?
The equation comes from conservation of energy. ##u## is the initial velocity of the incoming proton. The initial velocity of the other proton is zero. So the total kinetic energy is ##\frac{1}{2}mu^2##.

[In the other thread, context is supplied. This is an elastic impact of an arriving proton with an equally massive proton that begins at rest]

After the collision, the incoming proton moves away with velocity ##v## and the other proton moves away with velocity ##s##. So the total kinetic energy is ##\frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}ms^2##.

By conservation of energy, initial energy is equal to final energy so ##\frac{1}{2}mu^2=\frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}ms^2##.The equation also looks very much like a statement of the Pythagorean theorem.

If one looks at conservation of momentum then the momentum of the incoming proton ##m\vec{u}## must be equal to the sum of the momenta of the two departing protons, ##m\vec{v} + m\vec{s}##. We can divide out the ##m## and get ##\vec{u}=\vec{v} + \vec{s}##.

If the two departing protons move away at right angles to one another then the magnitude of the vector sum is given by the Pythagorean theorem so that ##|\vec{u}|^2=|\vec{v}|^2+|\vec{s}|^2##. One can multiply by ##\frac{1}{2}m## to recover the original equation: ##\frac{1}{2}mu^2=\frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}ms^2## and all is well.

Conversely, if the departing velocities do not have the Pythagorean relationship with the arrival velocity then the angle between the departure velocities will not be a right angle.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Disputationem
Looks like you tried to say that in a collision the sum of k.e. before the collision = sum of k.e. after.
But you have to add other sources of energy in addition to k.e.
Say a bomb goes off at the collision.. Obviously, k.e. before collision ##\neq## k.e. after collision:
k.e. after = k.e before + energy of explosion going to k.e.

Note that conservation of momentum is not affected by the explosion since the explosion is not an externally applied force.
 
Steve4Physics said:
The final terms

Aplologies if I'm wrong, but from your wording, it seems like you believe the term "½ ms^2” is a value of acceleration. (a=0.5 m/s²).

This would not make sense because you can’t add an acceleration to an energy.

To make sense, ‘s’ needs to be the symbol for the speed of some object. (It's a bad choice of a symbol for speed though!)

For example, the equation would be valid in this situation:

Particle A (mass m, speed u) collides elastically with particle B (mass m, stationary). After the collision A's speed is v and B’s speed is s.

Since kinetic energy is conserved in elastic collisions:
½mu² = ½mv² + ½ms2
Steve4Physics said:
Thank you so much! I was so confused about why they were mentioning displacement instead of acceleration all of a sudden and now I know!
 
jbriggs444 said:
[moved my response here from the other thread]

The equation comes from conservation of energy. ##u## is the initial velocity of the incoming proton. The initial velocity of the other proton is zero. So the total kinetic energy is ##\frac{1}{2}mu^2##.

[In the other thread, context is supplied. This is an elastic impact of an arriving proton with an equally massive proton that begins at rest]

After the collision, the incoming proton moves away with velocity ##v## and the other proton moves away with velocity ##s##. So the total kinetic energy is ##\frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}ms^2##.

By conservation of energy, initial energy is equal to final energy so ##\frac{1}{2}mu^2=\frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}ms^2##.The equation also looks very much like a statement of the Pythagorean theorem.

If one looks at conservation of momentum then the momentum of the incoming proton ##m\vec{u}## must be equal to the sum of the momenta of the two departing protons, ##m\vec{v} + m\vec{s}##. We can divide out the ##m## and get ##\vec{u}=\vec{v} + \vec{s}##.

If the two departing protons move away at right angles to one another then the magnitude of the vector sum is given by the Pythagorean theorem so that ##|\vec{u}|^2=|\vec{v}|^2+|\vec{s}|^2##. One can multiply by ##\frac{1}{2}m## to recover the original equation: ##\frac{1}{2}mu^2=\frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}ms^2## and all is well.

Conversely, if the departing velocities do not have the Pythagorean relationship with the arrival velocity then the angle between the departure velocities will not be a right angle.
Your reply is complex but it makes a bundle of sense! Thanks a mil!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K