Explaining the Infinite Reflection of a Pencil in Mirror Photography

AI Thread Summary
Using flat mirrors positioned opposite each other creates an infinite reflection effect, where a pencil placed between them appears to be reflected endlessly. This phenomenon can be explained through ray tracing, illustrating how light travels and reflects off surfaces. Each reflection diminishes in brightness due to the efficiency of the reflection, with front-surface mirrors providing the clearest images by minimizing light loss. In contrast, standard mirrors produce multiple reflections, leading to varying brightness levels—first reflections are dimmer due to glass interference, while subsequent reflections are even less bright. For accurate physics demonstrations, first-surface mirrors are preferred because they eliminate the additional reflections caused by the glass, ensuring clearer and more precise results.
intimidckfan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a project in school in which I have to take a picture of a physics phenomenon that has to do with light and reflection. So I was thinking to use flat mirrors and put two of them in front of each other. How would I explain why the pencil I put in the middle is reflected infinitely and that it gets darker as it goes into the mirror images?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use ray tracing and talk about the efficiency of each reflection. BTW, unless you are using front-surface mirrors, you will get multiple reflections from each mirror surface. The first (dim) one from the front surface of the glass, the second (stronger) one from the metallic reflection surface, the third (dimmer) one from the re-reflection inside the mirror back from the inside of the glass, to the metallic surface, and back out of the glass, etc.

You should talk about the difference in reflection quality in your project too. Talk about why first-surface mirrors are used for real physics work...
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top