Explaining Why Air Molecules Have Smaller Masses

  • Thread starter Thread starter binbagsss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Molecules
AI Thread Summary
Air molecules have smaller masses to ensure that their average impulses do not tend to zero when interacting with larger particles, such as smoke. The smaller mass of air molecules allows them to generate minimal displacement in smoke particles, which exhibit very small movements. Kinetic theory supports this by stating that heat energy causes molecular vibrations at temperatures above absolute zero. Observations of Brownian motion further confirm that warm air molecules are in constant motion. Understanding these principles clarifies why air molecules must have smaller masses.
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
account for the fact that air molecules have a smaller mass?

I have down in my notes something about if a larger particle was used then the average impulses would tend to 0, could someone please explain this?

thanks a lot !
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Actually, the smoke particles have very small movements - so the air molecules hitting them must have a smaller mass - if they were bigger than the smoke , then the particles would be displaced by much larger amounts.
kinetic theory states that heat energy involves the vibration of molecules at all temperatures above absolute zero - the Brownian motion observations confirm that warm air molecules are in constant motion(vibration). Hope that helps your question! :smile:

-Earthmosphere
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top