Explanation of an angular momentum term

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the angular momentum term mVfR + Icmω in the context of a solid ball transitioning from sliding to rolling without slipping. The user is confused about how this term is derived and its significance in the problem involving a ball sliding on a surface with friction. They acknowledge the conservation of angular momentum but seek clarity on the specific components of the final term. The problem involves calculating the ball's speed when it starts rolling and the energy lost due to friction. Overall, the user expresses a strong need for help in grasping this concept.
Levi Tate
Messages
121
Reaction score
0
Hello, could somebody please explain to me why in 4 of these solutions, the angular momentum final term about point p is mVfR + Icmω ? It is in huge attached solutions my teacher posted.

Thank you very much in advance

Here is the problem in case you are interested of Horne context.

4. A solid ball of radius are initially slides without rotating on a horizontal surface with a variable coefficient of friction. If the initial speed is Vo, find the speed when the ball begins to roll without slipping. Also find the energy lost due to friction
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    32.1 KB · Views: 392
Physics news on Phys.org
Upright, sorry about this, it looks upright when I upload it..
 

Attachments

  • photo.jpg
    photo.jpg
    19.9 KB · Views: 391
Come on.. I know you smart cats know what this angular momentum term is all about. PLEASE I AM DESPERATE.
 
Sorry my iPad edited this very poorly...4. A solid ball of radius R initially slides without rotating on a horizontal surface with a variable coefficient of friction. If the initial speed is Vo, find the speed when the ball begins to roll without slipping. Also find the energy lost due to friction
 
I understand the angular momentum is conserved but I don't understand the final term in the angular momentum. I can't find out anything, it's bewildering me.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top