Explanation the difference between various types of plots

Ein Krieger
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Why people use semi-log and log-log plots? What are they advantage?

Linear plots are more convenient as they show the direct relationship between x and y variables, aren't they?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ein Krieger said:
Hello,

Why people use semi-log and log-log plots? What are they advantage?

Linear plots are more convenient as they show the direct relationship between x and y variables, aren't they?

Thanks.

There are probably lots of reasons that vary by technical field. In electrical engineering (EE), we use semi-log and log-log plots because our circuits operate over wide frequency ranges (many decades of frequency, typically), and the gain (frequency response) of the circuits can vary quite a bit as well. When you use a log plot, a 1/f relationship turns into a straight line, whose characteristics are much more obvious (like what is the slope?).

http://csserver.evansville.edu/~ric...bode_plots/html/bode_plots_html_m27115e71.png

.
 
Ein Krieger said:
Linear plots are more convenient as they show the direct relationship between x and y variables, aren't they?

One reason for making logarithmic or semi-logarithmic plots is that the turn other types of functions into straight line graphs.

For eaxmple if ##y = a^x## where ##a## is an (unknown) constant, then ##\log y = x \log a## and you can find ##a## from the "straight line" graph of ##\log y## against ##x##.

If ##y = x^a##, then ##\log y = a \log x## and you can find ##a## from a graph of ##\log y## against ##\log x##.

If you are measuring data, it's easier to "see" how close the points are to a straight line than trying to guess how well points lie on the "right" curve, especially if you don't know what the right curve actually is!
 
Transformed plots are useful when they simplify the relationship of the data. Of course you need to know what transformations are helpful in advance, and be ready to recognize when things have gone wrong. Most of the time it is easier to recognize the transformed pattern than the natural for, but there is a danger of tricking your self into seeing a pattern wit ha transformation.
 
Some kinds of plots such as log-log or semi-log may more easily allow the graph to appear as a line. We like NEAT relationships that we can see.

In cases in which semilog or log-log do not give appearance of a line, some other type of data treatment might give one.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top