Explicit joint probability distribution.

carllacan
Messages
272
Reaction score
3
Hi!

Suppose we have two variables Y and Z that depend on a third one, X. We are given P(x), P(y|x) and P(z|x). The joint probability distribution P(x,y,z), according to the chain probability rule, is given by P(x,y,z) = P(x)P(y|x)P(z|x,y)

But how can we compute P(z|x,y) with the given data?

Since Y does not depend on Z directly I "feel" that P(z|x,y) = P(z|x)(Px) but I can't find a logical reason for it.

Can you lend me a hand?

Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are y and z independent of each other?
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Are y and z independent of each other?

This actually comes from an exercise in a book and neither P(y|z) nor P(z|y) are given, so I assume so.
 
Last edited:
If z and y are independent then P(z|x,y) is just P(z|x). (NOT "P(z|x)P(x)" which is P(z))
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
And the joint probability distribution would simply be P(x,y,z) = P(x)P(y|x)P(z|x), right?

It which makes sense because Y and Z are, so to speak, symmetrical in the causal network, so they should also be symmetrical in this expression.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top