What Defines a Closed System Free from External Forces?

AI Thread Summary
A closed system is defined as one with no external forces acting on it, which is crucial for the conservation of momentum. When a toy car collides with a wall, the momentum is not conserved because the wall is part of a larger system connected to the Earth. To create a closed system for momentum conservation, one must consider all relevant forces and include all interacting masses within the defined "bag." For example, if both the toy car and a large block of concrete are considered together in space, momentum can be conserved as there are no external forces acting on them. Understanding the interconnectedness of objects, such as walls being part of buildings and ultimately the Earth, is essential in analyzing momentum in real-world scenarios.
Drizzy
Messages
210
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



apparently momentum is only sure to be conserved in a closed system - no external forces. So that means if a toy car collides with a wall then the total momentum efter won't be the same as before. That is because the wall would
be joined to something else and ultimately to the Earth.

What exactly is a closed system with no external forces? And isn't everything on the Earth connected to earth?

2. Homework Equations
3. The Attempt at a Solution
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A closed system is exactly what you said. No external forces.

The idea of "system" is fairly artificial. You draw a "bag" around the things you are interested in. That's your system. For purposes of conservation of momentum, you have to take notice if any forces go in or out through the "bag."

So if your system is just the toy car, then it is not closed. Forces involving the wall penetrate in through the "bag."

But suppose instead of a wall it was a big block of concrete. And both the car and the stone were floating in space with nothing contacting them. And you include both masses as part of your "system." Then for your system there are no forces penetrating in or out. And momentum is conserved. It may be very hard to accurately measure the change in velocity of the big block of concrete when a small toy car hits it. If the toy car masses 100 grams, and the concrete masses 1E8 grams, for example, the change in velocity of the concrete will be correspondingly small.
 
So you mean that there are things that can affect the wall other than the car?
 
Drizzy said:
So you mean that there are things that can affect the wall other than the car?

^_o
 
Sorry I am going to sound stupid but this is hard
 
The wall is attached to other walls that make up a building, the building is attached to the earth. Yes, there are a lot of things that 'affect the wall other than the car'.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top