What is Hyperdimensional Physics and Why is it Controversial?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vincentm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
Hyperdimensional physics is discussed in the context of Richard Hoagland's theories, which are widely regarded as pseudoscientific or "crackpot." The thread indicates a lack of serious engagement, as evidenced by the disparity between views and responses. Participants express skepticism about the validity of hyperdimensional physics, suggesting it lacks scientific credibility. The conversation concludes with a request for moderation to close the thread, highlighting the perceived futility of the discussion. Overall, hyperdimensional physics is viewed as a controversial and largely dismissed concept.
vincentm
Messages
322
Reaction score
3
What is...

'Hyperdimensional physics' ? If this is against the rules then i ask for a mod to please close this thread. Thank you :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seeing the amount of view vs responses in this thread, i can safely say that it's crackpot theory?
 
If by 'Hyperdimensional physics' you are referring to the stuff by Richard Hoagland: yes, it's crackpottery.
 
Doc Al said:
If by 'Hyperdimensional physics' you are referring to the stuff by Richard Hoagland: yes, it's crackpottery.
Thanks, that's all i needed to know, can a mod close this thread?
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top