What is the Concept of a Fractional Dimension Probability Sphere?

bchui
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
I have heard of such idea:

A sphere of fractional dimension 0<s<1 is understood as a probability sphere with probability s to have an electron at a certain position

for example the volume of the sphere S^{n-1} in \Re^n has volume

Vol(S^{n-1})= (2\Pi^{n/2})/(\Gamma(n/2)

and we can apply the result to non-integer values of n

Anyone have heard of this idea and show me the link for further information? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have been searching for the same thing, and a few places say that it is given by:

\Gamma^2(1/2)/\Gamma(n/2)

for any dimension, even fractional ones, but I am trying to find a way to prove it myself, perhaps using integration with respect to the Hausdorff measure (since it recognizes non-integer dimensions). And just a note- the formula you gave is actually the area measure of the unit S^{n-1} sphere, the volume of the unit S^{n-1} sphere is actually:

Vol(S^{n-1})=[2\pi^{(n-1)/2}]/[\Gamma((n-1)/2+1)],

**Note that the denominator can be rewritten {(n-1)/2}\Gamma((n-1)/2)}.
 
The proof for integer n is simple and done by induction. It could be found for example in

Chapter 5.9 of W Fleming: "Functions of Several Variables", Springer-
Verlag 1977

We generalize n! to \Gamma(n+1) and the formula is obtained.
My problem is the physical aspect. What is the physical mean of a "fractional sphere" and could it possibly be related to "probability sphere" in Quantum Mechanics?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top