Exponential Equilibrium Equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation e-aX + e-bX = 1 for real-valued x, where a and b are positive constants. While specific values can yield computational solutions, a general algebraic solution remains elusive. Reformulating the problem into forms like Yc + Yd = 1 leads to polynomial equations, but solutions in radicals are not generally possible for polynomials of degree five or higher. An example illustrates that with specific constants, the equation can be simplified to yield a solution, but challenges arise with less straightforward values. The conversation highlights the complexity of finding a universal solution for this type of equation.
ArbyFisher
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Solve for real-valued x, e-aX + e-bX = 1, where a and b are arbitrary known constants > 0.

For example, e-48.12/50 + e-48.12/100 ~ 1.00

In this case X = 48.12 (to two decimals), a = 1/50 and b = 1/100.
For any specific values of a and b, a computational solution can easily be determined, but a general algebraic solution is desired.

The problem can be variously reformulated, i.e., Y = eX, Yc + Yd = 1, c and d < 0

... alas to no apparent avail. The equation sometimes seems like it should be a queuing theory probability or perhaps some geometric shape or I don't know anymore (obviously) ... thanks in any case.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you reduce it to something like Yc + Yd = 1, if c and d are rational then you should be able to write it as a polynomial equation in Y. Unfortunately, if the degree of that polynomial is at least 5, you're not in general going to be able to write a solution explicitly in terms of radicals.

In your specific example, let's say you have e-x/50 + e-x/100 = 1. Substituting y = e-x/100 (so x = -100 ln y) you have y2 + y = 1, which has solution y = (-1 ± √5) / 2, but y must be positive so y = (√5 - 1) / 2, so x = -100 ln ((√5 - 1) / 2) = 48.1212.
 
Last edited:
Exactly. If the numbers are "very nice", as in the example, then the factoring works charmingly. But, if the numbers are only rationally nice, then the solution begins to devolve into combinatorial factoring dementia, and factoring then doesn't appear to be a general solution. Finally, of course, if the numbers are irrational, then ... Thank you much for your reply.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top