Exponential Equilibrium Equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation e-aX + e-bX = 1 for real-valued x, where a and b are positive constants. While specific values can yield computational solutions, a general algebraic solution remains elusive. Reformulating the problem into forms like Yc + Yd = 1 leads to polynomial equations, but solutions in radicals are not generally possible for polynomials of degree five or higher. An example illustrates that with specific constants, the equation can be simplified to yield a solution, but challenges arise with less straightforward values. The conversation highlights the complexity of finding a universal solution for this type of equation.
ArbyFisher
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Solve for real-valued x, e-aX + e-bX = 1, where a and b are arbitrary known constants > 0.

For example, e-48.12/50 + e-48.12/100 ~ 1.00

In this case X = 48.12 (to two decimals), a = 1/50 and b = 1/100.
For any specific values of a and b, a computational solution can easily be determined, but a general algebraic solution is desired.

The problem can be variously reformulated, i.e., Y = eX, Yc + Yd = 1, c and d < 0

... alas to no apparent avail. The equation sometimes seems like it should be a queuing theory probability or perhaps some geometric shape or I don't know anymore (obviously) ... thanks in any case.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you reduce it to something like Yc + Yd = 1, if c and d are rational then you should be able to write it as a polynomial equation in Y. Unfortunately, if the degree of that polynomial is at least 5, you're not in general going to be able to write a solution explicitly in terms of radicals.

In your specific example, let's say you have e-x/50 + e-x/100 = 1. Substituting y = e-x/100 (so x = -100 ln y) you have y2 + y = 1, which has solution y = (-1 ± √5) / 2, but y must be positive so y = (√5 - 1) / 2, so x = -100 ln ((√5 - 1) / 2) = 48.1212.
 
Last edited:
Exactly. If the numbers are "very nice", as in the example, then the factoring works charmingly. But, if the numbers are only rationally nice, then the solution begins to devolve into combinatorial factoring dementia, and factoring then doesn't appear to be a general solution. Finally, of course, if the numbers are irrational, then ... Thank you much for your reply.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top