Exponential Probability Density of Electron in 1D Potential Well

  • Thread starter Thread starter lozzyjay
  • Start date Start date
lozzyjay
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An electron is in a 1 dimensional potential well. If the energy of the electron is < V0, show that the probability density P(x) for the electron falls exponentially:

P(x) = Aexp(-x/L)


I honestly have no clue, I've been trying all day to do this!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to show us what you have been doing "all day", so that we can help to guide you in the right direction. What is the basic equation that you should be using to approach this problem? It has a catchy name...
 
\frac{-h bar^{2}}{2m} \frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2} = (E - V_{0})\psi

So that's the schrodinger equation for when the energy is less than V0 I think...

Then to show the probability density...

P(x) = \int\psi(x)* \psi(x) = 1

I have no idea what to do next...
 
Ok, so the schrodinger equation is psi''=k*psi, where k is a positive constant. What do the solutions to that equation look like?
 
The solutions are of the form

\psi = Ae^{ikx} + Be^{-ikx}
 
Noooo. The k in psi''=k*psi is real and positive. How about A*exp(sqrt(k)*x)+B*exp(-sqrt(k)*x)?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top