Exponential sums and congruences

  • Thread starter Thread starter mhill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential Sums
mhill
Messages
180
Reaction score
1
let be the exponential sum

S= \sum_{n=1}^{N}e( \frac{f(x)}{p})

e(x)= exp( 2i \pi x)

my conjecture is that since the complex exponential takes its maximum value '1' when x is equal to an integer then

Re(S)= \Pi (f,N) with \Pi (f,N) is the number of solutions on the interval (1,N) of the congruence

f(x) =0 mod(p) and f(x) is a Polynomial.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Forgive me if this is a stupid question- but what's p[/tex]? Or did you mean n[/tex] instead or p[/tex] as the number of prime factors of n[/tex] or something?
 
any prime
 
soandos said:
any prime
I still don't get over what exactly that summation for S[/tex] is done. A clarification please?
 
o sorry.. i should have written


S= \sum_{n=1}^{N}e( \frac{f(n)}{p})


the sum is taken over 'n' but if the prime 'p' divides f(n) then the complex exponential is equal to '1'
 
Okay then p[/tex] is a prime of one&#039;s choosing.<br /> <br /> We have,<br /> <br /> S = \sum_{n = 1}^{N} \exp{\left(\frac{2\pi i}{p}f(n)\right)}<br /> <br /> Then,<br /> \Re(S) = \sum_{n = 1}^{N} \cos{\left(\frac{2\pi}{p}f(n)\right)}<br /> <br /> If f(n)[/tex] is a multiple of p[/tex], then the the real part of S[/tex] will &amp;amp;amp;#039;count&amp;amp;amp;#039; each solution of that congruence, but what about certain f(n)[/tex] values that don&amp;amp;amp;amp;#039;t and hence give rise to non-zero real and imaginary components? They won&amp;amp;amp;amp;#039;t be 1 in a single go, but they can possibly accumulate to values greater than 1 I think. So some bounds for such a theorem also become necessary if I haven&amp;amp;amp;amp;#039;t missed anything.
 
Last edited:
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top