Expressing complex function in standard rectangular form

AI Thread Summary
The complex function 2.5j e^(-j40*pi) can be transformed into Cartesian form as 2.5j, which is confirmed as correct. The transformation involves using Euler's formula, leading to 2.5j (cos[40pi] - jsin[40pi]) resulting in 2.5j (1-0). The confusion arises from the ability to revert to the original exponential form, as e^(-j40pi) simplifies to e^0, which equals 1. The polar form of 2.5j is actually 2.5e^(j*pi/2), highlighting the periodic nature of complex exponentials. This discussion clarifies the conversion process and the relationship between the forms.
elimenohpee
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
I'm given a complex function in the exponential form:

2.5j e^(-j40*pi)

Transforming this into the standard Cartesian form is pretty straight forward, but the extra j multiplying the 2.5 is kind of throwing me off. I don't know if I did it right, but this is what I did:

2.5j (cos[-40pi] + jsin[-40pi]) = 2.5j (cos[40pi] - jsin[40pi]) = 2.5j (1-0) = 2.5j

Is that correct? I don't know if it is or not, because I don't see how you could transform it back into the original form after putting it into Cartesian form. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
elimenohpee said:
I'm given a complex function in the exponential form:

2.5j e^(-j40*pi)

Transforming this into the standard Cartesian form is pretty straight forward, but the extra j multiplying the 2.5 is kind of throwing me off. I don't know if I did it right, but this is what I did:

2.5j (cos[-40pi] + jsin[-40pi]) = 2.5j (cos[40pi] - jsin[40pi]) = 2.5j (1-0) = 2.5j

Is that correct? I don't know if it is or not, because I don't see how you could transform it back into the original form after putting it into Cartesian form. Thanks

Looks right to me. Is there a way to check the answer?
 
elimenohpee said:
I'm given a complex function in the exponential form:

2.5j e^(-j40*pi)

Transforming this into the standard Cartesian form is pretty straight forward, but the extra j multiplying the 2.5 is kind of throwing me off. I don't know if I did it right, but this is what I did:

2.5j (cos[-40pi] + jsin[-40pi]) = 2.5j (cos[40pi] - jsin[40pi]) = 2.5j (1-0) = 2.5j

Is that correct? I don't know if it is or not, because I don't see how you could transform it back into the original form after putting it into Cartesian form. Thanks

Yes that's correct :approve:

If you are having difficulty transforming it into the original form, it is probably because the original form is not really the polar form.

The polar form of 2.5j is 2.5e^(j*pi/2) but that is equivalent to the original expression since e^(-j*40pi)=e^0=1 (since the complex exponential has a period of 2pi).
 
Ok good :)

Such an odd question, I guess it was more or less to try and throw you off.
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top