Expression for current through loop as a function of time

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the expression for current through a circular coil in a time-varying magnetic field. The magnetic field is described by B = B0sin(ωt), and the user initially calculated the current using magnetic flux and induced electromotive force (ε). However, it was pointed out that the current is not constant and must account for self-induction, which affects the relationship between current and the external magnetic field. The importance of including a term for inductance (L) in the equation was emphasized, particularly when considering the transient response of the circuit. The user acknowledged the need to revise their calculations to incorporate self-induction effects.
kez
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An N-turn circular coil of radius r with a total resistance of R is placed such that the normal to its plane is parallel to the +z axis. A uniform magnetic field varies with time according to B=B0sin(\omegat) where the amplitude B0 and angular frequency ω are constants. Find an expression for the current in the loop as a function of time.

Homework Equations



1. \PhiB=\intBcosA
2. ε=d/dt \PhiB
3. ε=iR

The Attempt at a Solution


I took the integral of the magnetic field to find flux (used equation 1 from above). I multiplied by N to account for the N number of loops. Then I took the derivative of the magnetic flux (used equation 2) to determine ε. After, I just plugged in ε into the 3rd equation and solved for current... But it doesn't really make sense to plus in a value that varies with time into an equation that deals only with constant values.

I think I missed something important here, so any help would be appreciated. I've also included an attachment of the question and the answer I got using the steps I outlined above.

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • physics q.PNG
    physics q.PNG
    9.1 KB · Views: 950
Physics news on Phys.org
Your work appears to be correct. It's important to note that there's nothing saying the current or potential generated is a constant value; they can be functions of time, just as the B-field is.
 
If the net field piercing the coil is B0sin(wt) then what you did is OK. But if B is an external B field = B0sin(wt) then you need to realize that the net B field thru the coil is the sum of the external B field and the self-induced B field due to the current in the coil.

With the latter assumption the current does not track the external field as -N dø/dt / R with ø = AB0sin(wt) but builds up over time with a time constant = L/R where L and R are the inductance and resistance resp. of the coil.

Things get even dizzier if you also want to consider the effect of the induced B on the external B field. This is the problem of mutual inductance on which e.g. transformers are based.

EDIT: I should add that even in the steady-state the effects of self-induction must be considered. The phase of current will not be in quadrature (90 deg. phase shift) to the external B field and there is also attenuation compared to ignoring the self-induced field since the induced field 'fights' the external field via Lenz's law.

But in all the above if R is large (R/L >> 1/w) then the effects of self-induction can be ignored, since then the induced current will be small and so will the self-induced B field.
 
Last edited:
My answer was marked wrong, so I think I'll have to go back and take self-induction into account. Thanks to the both of you for your fast responses - I appreciate it a lot!
 
kez said:
My answer was marked wrong, so I think I'll have to go back and take self-induction into account. Thanks to the both of you for your fast responses - I appreciate it a lot!

Well, you're the one in ten who doesn't abandon the thread after their original post!
Hint for you: Instead of just Ri = -N d(phi)/dt, add a term L di/dt.

You can probably ignore the transient part of the answer (assume the B field was present a long time).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top