Expression for the moment of inertia

Firben
Messages
141
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The thin, homogeneous bent rod has the mass m and the total length of 4b. It rotates with the angular speed of ω = ω0(24i + 12j - 6.0k) (only rotation)

Determine the expression for the moment of inertia with consideration of the center of mass of the rod

The figure:
http://s716.photobucket.com/user/Pitoraq/media/Mek4_zps8205c021.png.html

Homework Equations



H = (Ixxωx-Ixyωy-Ixzωz)i+(-Iyzωx+Iyyωy-Iyzωz)j+(-Izxωx-Izyωy+Izzωz)k

m = ρb


The Attempt at a Solution

¨


I plotted the figure in yx-axis and could see that

Iyz=Iyx=Iyz=Izy=Ixz=Izx=0 is symmetric

But I'm not sure about Ixx, Iyy and Izz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you post your graph?
 
Firben said:

The Attempt at a Solution

¨


I plotted the figure in yx-axis and could see that

Iyz=Iyx=Iyz=Izy=Ixz=Izx=0 is symmetric

But I'm not sure about Ixx, Iyy and Izz

You might have to, you know, calculate Ixx, Iyy, and Izz. It's a shocking suggestion, I'm sure.
 
The centre of mass is easy: it is at the origin of y-z axis.

There are three parts to this problem: the rotating center bit, and the two sides. By symmetry, the MOI of the left and right side are equal.

Calculate the MOI for rotation in the ##i## and ##j## and ##k## axes. Use parallel axes theorem to calculate the MOI of the sides.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top