A Extending a linear representation by an anti-linear operator

hideelo
Messages
88
Reaction score
15
When we consider representation of the O(1,3) we divide the representation up into the connected part of SO(1,3) which we then extend by adding in the discrete transformations P and T. However, while (as far as I know) we always demand that the SO(1,3) and P be represented as linear operators, we demand that T be anti-linear.

If I start with some representation of SO(1,3) and I extended it by including T. Since its anti linear and anti unitary it can be written as T = CU where U is unitary and C is the complex conjugation operator. Suppose U were already in SO(1,3), then while I say I am adding T really the only new object I am adding is C. So suppose I have any representation and I extend by C, what is this new object?

I am just looking for the mathematical framework in which to approach this. Once I add T it isn't a linear representation anymore, I see that we have some operators which are homomorphic to O(1,3) but this isn't a representation as I recognize it. So what is this?

While I am framing all this in the context of SO(1,3), it's only because that is how it arose for me. Really, I'm interested in the general question. Suppose I had some linear representation of some group which I then extend by the complex conjugation operator, thereby allowing anti-linear operators. Is this a representation of some bigger group?Any references, sources, etc would be really appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I usually start with the definitions. A representation of ##O(1,3)## is a group homomorphism into ##\operatorname{GL}(V)##. As the orthogonal group is already a matrix group, we get one representation for free.

You could also have a look into:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387901086/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top