Extracellular ion concentrations and neural membrane potential

AI Thread Summary
When extracellular potassium concentration increases, it leads to depolarization of the neuron due to a net inward movement of potassium ions, while changes in extracellular chloride concentration do not significantly affect the membrane potential. Chloride's contribution to resting membrane potential is acknowledged, but its equilibrium can adjust without altering the overall membrane potential. The influx of potassium alters the electrical gradient, causing chloride to move in response, but this does not equate to a similar effect when chloride levels change. The text suggests that chloride can reach equilibrium through internal concentration adjustments without impacting the steady-state membrane potential. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for grasping the complexities of neuronal behavior in response to ion concentration changes.
wrongusername
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
I'm learning about a very basic model neuron, in which only potassium and chloride is permeable.

Why is it that when the extracellular concentration of potassium is increased, the neuron become depolarized, whereas when extracellular concentration of chloride is reduced, the neural membrane potential remains the same? Intuitively it would seem that whatever applies to potassium also applies to chloride.

Even when sodium permeability is added to the simple neuron model, it seems chloride can be ignored as it more or less takes care of itself no matter where the membrane potential goes.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I believe this is your issue-

basic model

Chloride does contribute to resting membrane potential and any changes in intra- or extracellular conc. of it would definitely alter it.

Since I can't figure out complex fractions inside parentheses in LaTeX, I've just attached a picture. Sorry for the blurriness.
 

Attachments

  • 20140824_103105.jpg
    20140824_103105.jpg
    32.1 KB · Views: 748
aroc91 said:
I believe this is your issue-



Chloride does contribute to resting membrane potential and any changes in intra- or extracellular conc. of it would definitely alter it.

Since I can't figure out complex fractions inside parentheses in LaTeX, I've just attached a picture. Sorry for the blurriness.

Ahh excellent, thanks!

Though I do wonder what my textbook was talking about when it says:

... The model cell membrane is permeable to potassium and chloride, but not to sodium or to the internal anion.

...

In neurons and in many other cells, the resting membrane potential is sensitive to changes in extracellular potassium concentration but is relatively unaffected by changes in extracellular chloride. To understand how this comes about it is useful to consider the consequences of such changes in the model cell.

...

The increase in extracellular potassium reduces the concentration gradient for outward potassium movement, while initially leaving the electrical gradient unchanged. As a result there will be a net inward movement of potassium ions. As positive charges accumulate on its inner surface, the membrane is depolarized. This, in turn, means that chloride ions are no longer in equilibrium, and they move into the cell as well. Potassium and chloride entry continues until a new equilibrium is established, with both ions at a new concentration ratio consistent with the new membrane potential, in this example -68 mV.

...

Similar considerations apply to changes in extracellular chloride concentration, but with a marked difference: When the new steady state is finally reached, the membrane potential is essentially unchanged. ... Chloride leaves the cell, depolarizing the membrane toward the new chloride equilibrium potential (-68 mV). Potassium, being no longer in equilibrium, leaves as well. ... Because the intracellular concentration of potassium is high, the fractional change in concentration produced by the efflux is relatively small. However, the efflux of chloride causes a sizable fractional change in the intracellular chloride concentration, and hence in the chloride equilibrium potential. As chloride continues to leave the cell, the equilibrium potential returns toward its original value. The process continues until the chloride and potassium equilibrium potentials are again equal and the membrane potential is restored.

But if efflux of chloride changes chloride's equilibrium potential a lot because there's not that much of it, then the same must be true for an influx of chloride when potassium is introduced outside the cell. I don't understand the book's explanation for this phenomenon.

Later, when the book explains the constant field equation using potassium and sodium, it says

How do these considerations apply to chloride? As for all other ions, there must be no net chloride current across the resting membrane. As already discussed, chloride is able to reach equilibrium simply by an appropriate adjustment in internal concentration, without affecting the steady-state membrane potential.

Would you happen to know what the book is trying to say here? Thanks.
 
I googled the passage you quoted and got http://homepage.univie.ac.at/andreas.franz.reichelt/intro2cogsci2/protected/nichols_2001_neuron_ch5.pdf .

Looking at Fig. 5.2 and the accompanying text, in both cases, potassium and chloride leave or enter the cell together leave the cell together, so the change of potassium and chloride concentration in the cell must be the same, if the cell volume is unchanged. However, in one case the cell volume increases, while in the other case the cell volume decreases, since water moves to maintain osmotic balance. After taking into account the different final cell volumes, you should be able to get the final concentrations given in the book.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top