Stargazing Eyepiece for refractor telescope

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicoRaj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Telescope
AI Thread Summary
For building a refractor telescope, a biconvex lens with a 27 cm focal length can serve as the objective, but a short focal length eyepiece is essential for higher magnification, especially for viewing details like the rings of Saturn. A positive lens is recommended for the eyepiece to avoid optical issues associated with negative lenses. The f-number of the eyepiece should be close to that of the objective, which is 2.7. It's advisable to consider using a Barlow lens and to have multiple eyepieces for varying magnifications. Consulting a telescope-building guide and connecting with local amateur astronomers can provide valuable insights and support.
PhysicoRaj
Gold Member
Messages
538
Reaction score
49
Hi, Iam thinking of making my own telescope and I have a magnifying glass lens, biconvex, about 10 cm in diameter and 27 cm focal length. I think it would be better as the objective. For the eyepiece, what type of lens, of what focal length and aperture diameter should I use? (I hope to identify the rings of Saturn... I may not be able to .. but at least the craters of the moon are okay.)
Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The rings of Saturn are a piece of cake, but with that short focal length, you'll need a short focal length eyepiece and maybe a Barlow.
 
Then what type of a configuration you suggest(focal length combination and size)? May be I will try to get both new, the eyepiece and the objective.
 
PhysicoRaj said:
Hi, Iam thinking of making my own telescope and I have a magnifying glass lens, biconvex, about 10 cm in diameter and 27 cm focal length. I think it would be better as the objective. For the eyepiece, what type of lens, of what focal length and aperture diameter should I use? (I hope to identify the rings of Saturn... I may not be able to .. but at least the craters of the moon are okay.)
Thanks.

The ratio of the objective and eyepiece focal lengths provides the (angular) magnification, so the shorter the focal length of the eyepiece, the greater the magnification. Using a negative (concave) lens for the eyepiece is worse than a positive lens when you are trying to look through the telescope (see Galilean vs. Keplerian telescopes).

http://depts.washington.edu/hssexec/committee/hss_galileo.html

The f/# of your objective is 2.7, so the f-number of your eyepiece does not need to be much larger than 2.7 as well.

This simple analysis completely ignores aberrations, which are likely to be large.
 
A common simple refractor design is a 100 mm doublett lens with a focal length of 1000 mm. For maximum FoV you'd need a 50 mm eyepice. Together with a 2xbarlow lens and a second eyepiece around 12 mm. This way you'd get magnifications of 20, 40, 83 and 167.

I'd recommend that you start by getting your hands on a book on building telescopes and checking if there is an amateur astronomer club nearby. There are a lot of gotchas if you haven't built a telescope before.
 
Thanks a lot...
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
226
Views
15K
Replies
27
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Back
Top