F1 control arms - Designed with downforce in mind or?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chriswh86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Control Mind
AI Thread Summary
F1 control arms are primarily designed to maintain a symmetrical profile, as mandated by regulations, to prevent them from being used as aerodynamic devices. This design choice aims to ensure safety at high speeds, as any aerodynamic shape could pose risks during suspension movement. While the rules restrict the use of control arms for downforce generation, some argue that innovative engineering could still allow for aerodynamic benefits within these constraints. The discussion highlights the balance between safety and performance in F1 design. Understanding the regulations is crucial for engineers looking to optimize both aspects.
chriswh86
Messages
19
Reaction score
2
Are F1 control arms, upper/lower designed to supply an amount of downforce or just the ability to cut through the air with as little interferance as possible?

I had seen a photo recent and it got me woundering. Maybe someone can explain

Cheers
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
F1 rules

Suspension and steering systems
The suspension members must have a symmetrical profile for the majority of their length. This is to prevent designers using them as aerodynamic devices.
 
I imagine it would be pretty dangerous if you had a aerodynamic shape of any kind going up and down[though slight,suspension has limited movement] at 200 mph.I maybe wrong,but it just doesn't seem safe.
 
Ranger Mike said:
F1 rules

Suspension and steering systems



The suspension members must have a symmetrical profile for the majority of their length. This is to prevent designers using them as aerodynamic devices.

That's indeed what the regulations say. There are symmetric airfoils though ;)
With this in mind I believe that a smart engineer can come up with a smart solution ;)
(http://www.formula1.com/news/technical/2013/0/1042.html )
Or is it totally forbidden for the suspension?
Hmm, I think I should study the regulations in depth...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Back
Top