Factoring in Inverse Laplace Transformations

xzibition8612
Messages
137
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



see attachment

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I don't get the part where it says "Solving this equation for X(s), we obtain ..."
Specifically jumping from 3/s(s2+3s+5) to (3/5)(1/s)-(3/5)[(s+2)/(s2+2s+5)].

How did the problem break up this fraction into separate subtracting fractions?? Is there a trick or something? I'm completely lost here. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • pic.png
    pic.png
    18.9 KB · Views: 430
Physics news on Phys.org
xzibition8612 said:

Homework Statement



see attachment

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I don't get the part where it says "Solving this equation for X(s), we obtain ..."
Specifically jumping from 3/s(s2+3s+5) to (3/5)(1/s)-(3/5)[(s+2)/(s2+2s+5)].

How did the problem break up this fraction into separate subtracting fractions?? Is there a trick or something? I'm completely lost here. Thanks.

It is just partial fractions. However, the expression given above is wrong: Maple 11 gets:

gs:=3/s/(s^2+3*s+5):lprint(%);
3/s/(s^2+3*s+5)

(Maple uses notation A/B/C to stand for A/(B*C), etc, and uses A/B*C to mean (A/B)*C, etc.)

g1:=convert(gs,parfrac,s): lprint(%);
3/5/s + 1/5*(-3*s-9)/(s^2+3*s+5)

So, Maple gets -(3/5)(s+3) instead of -(3/5)(s+2) in the numerator of the second term. You can easily check that (s+2) gives the wrong answer when you combine the two terms.

BTW: "partial fractions" is a standard tool in calculus, often used in computing integrals. Just Google 'partial fractions' if you have not seen this material before, or consult a calculus textbook.
 
i get it thx
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top