Factorizing and Finding Independent Solutions in ODEs

  • Thread starter Thread starter unscientific
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ode
unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



I'm currently taking a course on ordinary differential equations. I am now reading through the lecture slides but I'm not really sure about the " factorising the equation " part onwards:

25kmyrk.png

35k797n.png


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure what is the point of trying to factorize the differential equation and how the CF is made up of exponentials..

Secondly, how did they simply decide that x*emx gives an independent solution? Why not x2emx then?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, the "factorizing" is an "operator" method using that fact that we can treat repeated derivatives (as long as the coefficients are constants) as if they were products and so get a symbolic way of reducing the equation to a series of first order equations.

Second, If we have a differential equation of the form d^2y/dx- 2m dy/dx+ m^2y= 0 so that "trying" a solution of the form y= e^{rx} reduces the equation to r^2 e^{rx}- 2mr e^{rx}+ m^2e^rx= e^{rx}(r^2- 2mr+ m^2)= e^{rx}(r- m)^2= 0 and, since e^{mx} is never 0, we must have (r- m)^2= 0 which, of course, has the single root r= m. That tells us immediately that y= e^{mx} is a solution to the differential equation. Of course, because this is a second order linear, homogeneous solution, we need a second independent solution to be able to write the general solution.

It is easy to see, by checking, that y= xe^{mx} is a solution: if y= xe^{mx} then dy/dx= e^{mx}+ mxe^{mx} and d^2y/dx^2= 2me^{mx}+ m^2xe^{mx} so that d^2y/dx^2- 2m dy/dx+ m^2y= (2me^{mx}+ m^2xe^{mx})- 2m(e^{mx}+ mxe^{mx})+ xe^{mx}= (m^2xe^{mx}- 2m^2xe^{mx}+ m^2e^{mx})+ (2me^{mx}- 2me^{mx})= 0.

We can then appeal to the theory, that the set of all solutions to a second order linear homogeneous differential equation form a vector space of dimension 2 and so can be spanned by two independent solutions, to see that there cannot be other independent solutions.

And, of course, we see, by direct substitution, that is y= x^2e^{mx} then dy/dx= 2xe^{mx}+ mx^2e^{mx} and d^2y/dx^2= 2e^{mx}+ 4mxe^{mx}+ m^2x^2e^{mx} and the equation becomes (2e^{mx}+ 4mxe^{mx}+ m^2x^2e^{mx})- 2m(2xe^{mx}+ mx^2e^{mx})+ m^2x^2e^{mx}= (m^2x^2e^{mx}- 2^2x^2e^{mx}+ m^2x^2e^{mx})+ (4mxe^{mx}- 4mxe^{mx})+ (2e^{mx}= 2e^{mx}, not 0.

How would we know in advance that worked? Experience- and they are trying to save you the time required to get that experience.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top