Falling Object And Sound Takes 3.2sec

AI Thread Summary
A rock dropped from a cliff takes 3.2 seconds for the sound of its impact to reach the top, with the speed of sound at 340 m/s. The equations used to calculate the height of the cliff involve the rock's fall time and the sound travel time, but the original attempt resulted in imaginary answers, indicating a possible error in the equations. A suggested approach involves setting up three equations: one for the rock's fall, one for the sound's return, and one for the total time. A participant pointed out a sign error in the calculations, which could affect the results. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly setting up the equations and checking for errors to solve the problem accurately.
TomFoolery
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rock is dropped from a sea cliff and the sound of it striking the ocean is heard 3.2s later. If the speed of sound is 340m/s, how high is the cliff?

V0= 0
A=-9.8m/s2
Ttotal=3.2s
Tsound=Y/340
Y0=Height
Y=0 (height at sea)

Homework Equations



Y=Y0+V0T+1/2(-9.8m/s2)T2

becomes

-Y0=(-4.9m/s2)*(3.2s-(Y0*s/340))2

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried many different solutions, none seem to work. I am convinced that my problem lies in the equation above. Many of my answers are imaginary, so I must have a problem with my (3.2-y/340)2 part.

It seems to me that it all balances out in units, so it should be an arithmetic problem. Yet, every time I run it, I get different results. My best guess was to try:
(-4.9)(3.22-(6.4/340)y0+(1/3402)y02)-y0
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's probably easier to visualize if you set up three equations. One should represent the time it takes for the rock to fall; the second should represent the time it takes for the sound to get back to the top of the cliff; and the third is the total of both times.
 
TomFoolery:

You appear to have made a sign error in your last equation. The last term should be adding y0, rather than subtracting it. I get two real answers. (I never put any numbers in, so I don't have a numeric answer. I always use only symbols [with the exception of small integers, like 2], so it is much easier to manipulate.)

David
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your responses, I'll have to try the 3 equation idea and recheck my signs and run both to see if either/both work as I expect them to. This has been driving me nuts.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top