Falling Object And Sound Takes 3.2sec

AI Thread Summary
A rock dropped from a cliff takes 3.2 seconds for the sound of its impact to reach the top, with the speed of sound at 340 m/s. The equations used to calculate the height of the cliff involve the rock's fall time and the sound travel time, but the original attempt resulted in imaginary answers, indicating a possible error in the equations. A suggested approach involves setting up three equations: one for the rock's fall, one for the sound's return, and one for the total time. A participant pointed out a sign error in the calculations, which could affect the results. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly setting up the equations and checking for errors to solve the problem accurately.
TomFoolery
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rock is dropped from a sea cliff and the sound of it striking the ocean is heard 3.2s later. If the speed of sound is 340m/s, how high is the cliff?

V0= 0
A=-9.8m/s2
Ttotal=3.2s
Tsound=Y/340
Y0=Height
Y=0 (height at sea)

Homework Equations



Y=Y0+V0T+1/2(-9.8m/s2)T2

becomes

-Y0=(-4.9m/s2)*(3.2s-(Y0*s/340))2

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried many different solutions, none seem to work. I am convinced that my problem lies in the equation above. Many of my answers are imaginary, so I must have a problem with my (3.2-y/340)2 part.

It seems to me that it all balances out in units, so it should be an arithmetic problem. Yet, every time I run it, I get different results. My best guess was to try:
(-4.9)(3.22-(6.4/340)y0+(1/3402)y02)-y0
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's probably easier to visualize if you set up three equations. One should represent the time it takes for the rock to fall; the second should represent the time it takes for the sound to get back to the top of the cliff; and the third is the total of both times.
 
TomFoolery:

You appear to have made a sign error in your last equation. The last term should be adding y0, rather than subtracting it. I get two real answers. (I never put any numbers in, so I don't have a numeric answer. I always use only symbols [with the exception of small integers, like 2], so it is much easier to manipulate.)

David
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your responses, I'll have to try the 3 equation idea and recheck my signs and run both to see if either/both work as I expect them to. This has been driving me nuts.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top