Falling object Kinematics motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a falling object that covers one-fourth of its total distance during the last second of its fall. Participants are exploring the implications of this scenario to determine the height from which the object was dropped.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial conditions of the problem, particularly whether the initial velocity is zero. Some suggest that since the object is falling, the initial velocity may not be zero during the last second of its fall. Others propose using equations of motion to relate the height and time variables.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning assumptions about initial velocity and exploring different equations to relate the height and time. There is no explicit consensus yet, but various interpretations and approaches are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem does not specify the initial velocity, leading to different assumptions. The need for multiple equations to solve for the two unknowns (time and height) is also highlighted.

negation
Messages
817
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A falling object travels one-fourth of its distance during the last second of its fall. From what height was it dropped?

Homework Equations



none

The Attempt at a Solution




yf - yi = vit + 0.5gt^2
0.25x = 0 + 0.5(-9.8ms^-2)(1)^2
x = 19.6m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure that initial velocity is zero?
 
mishek said:
Are you sure that initial velocity is zero?

It was not specified so I went in with the assumption vi = 0.
 
The problem states that you have a falling object which has one more second to go (last second of it's fall). That means that from that point initial velocity isn't zero.
 
mishek said:
The problem states that you have a falling object which has one more second to go (last second of it's fall). That means that from that point initial velocity isn't zero.

Make sense-should I solve for vf first then?
 
you have two unknowns (T & H), you need two equations.

I would make them for two positions shown on a picture (H and 3/4H) by using above mentioned equation:

H=Vo*t + 1/2*g*t^2
 

Attachments

  • falling object.png
    falling object.png
    2.1 KB · Views: 621
mishek said:
you have two unknowns (T & H), you need two equations.

I would make them for two positions shown on a picture (H and 3/4H) by using above mentioned equation:

H=Vo*t + 1/2*g*t^2

H = vit + 0.5gt^2
1/4H = vit + 0.5gt^2

1/4H = vi(1) + 0.5g(1)^2
vi = 1/4H + 4.9ms^-2
H = (1/4H + 4.9ms^-2)t + 0.5gt^2
 
Hello, please check attached photo. Does that make sense?
 

Attachments

  • falling object.png
    falling object.png
    3 KB · Views: 613
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
mishek said:
Hello, please check attached photo. Does that make sense?

Why is vi=0 along the 3/4H?
 
  • #10
Because object starts falling from height H (from rest) where he has initial velocity 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K