Falling Objects (With air resistance)

AI Thread Summary
In discussions about falling objects with air resistance, it is established that heavier objects fall faster than lighter ones due to the effects of gravity and air resistance. The example of two identical jugs—one filled with water and the other empty—illustrates this principle, as the filled jug will hit the ground first. The argument hinges on the relationship between mass, gravitational force, and the force of air resistance, which affects acceleration differently based on mass. Heavier objects experience less relative air resistance, allowing them to maintain higher acceleration and speed throughout the fall. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the heavier jug will consistently be closer to the ground than the lighter one during the fall.
Morcam
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
So, I've been having a bit of an argument with a guy about falling, identical items, with varying masses.

Homework Statement



For the sake of the argument, we've been using the example of two identical jugs, one filled with water, and the other without. They are dropped at exactly the same time. I believe the one filled with water will hit the ground first, due to air resistance. He believes they will hit at the same time. I agree that they will, in a vacuum.

Homework Equations



Force of Air Resistance = Constant
Fg = m * g

The Attempt at a Solution



http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/newtlaws/u2l3e.cfm

In situations in which there is air resistance, more massive objects fall faster than less massive objects. But why? To answer the why question, it is necessary to consider the free-body diagrams for objects of different mass. Consider the falling motion of two skydivers: one with a mass of 100 kg (skydiver plus parachute) and the other with a mass of 150 kg (skydiver plus parachute). The free-body diagrams are shown below for the instant in time in which they have reached terminal velocity.

I'm not entirely sure why we're still having this argument, but he's very insistent, so I'd like a final answer from someone who knows this firsthand.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the heavier jug will hit the ground faster. There's absolutely no room for an argument to the contrary. To take an extreme case, a paper jug would take seconds to fall to the ground from eye level.
 
As the (possibly mentally defective) friend from morcams above post, I'd like to ensure I'm totally wrong by asking for a second opinion.
 
DarthPJB said:
As the (possibly mentally defective) friend from morcams above post, I'd like to ensure I'm totally wrong by asking for a second opinion.

Until the second opinion comes, I'll expand a bit on my answer. The force of gravity is mg, and air resistance is kAv^2. k is a constant, A is the cross-sectional area, and v is speed. Newton's second law says F=ma, so mg-kAv^2 = ma and a=g-kAv^2/m. Solving this equation will yield a position vs. time equation, but it's not necessary to go that far. Just examining the equation will do.

Go through this in your head: A jug is dropped. Gravity accelerates it at 9.8 m/s: that's the "g" in the equation a=g-kAv^2/m. If the mass is tiny, kAv^2/m would be huge, and acceleration would immediately drop. If the mass is high, kAv^2/m would be tiny, and acceleration would decrease slowly.

So the conclusions are:

(1) At every point in time during the fall, the heavier jug has a greater acceleration than the light one.
(2) At every point in time during the fall, the heavier jug has a greater speed than the light one.
(3) At every point in time during the fall, the heavier jug is closer to the ground than the light one.
 
I think perhaps I should have drunk a little less at the weekends while at collage, somehow I managed to have an hour argument over something so very obvious.
I was so sure I was right, I suppose this is how wars get started!
I'm going to accept my utter stupidity and ignorance in this matter and thank you kindly for your reply.

Now all I have to do is survive morcams jokes :/
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top