Falling Rock Climber (Work and Energy)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of the work-energy principle to a rock climber's fall and the resulting stretch of a rope. The climber falls a distance of 2l before the rope stretches, and the problem requires deriving an expression for the stretch x in terms of the mass m, gravitational force g, and spring constant k. The initial gravitational potential energy is converted into spring potential energy at maximum displacement. Participants suggest focusing on the work-energy principle rather than kinematic equations to solve for x. The final equation derived is x = (mg/k)[1 + √(1 + 4kl/mg)].
kubaanglin
Messages
47
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Stretchable ropes are used to safely arrest the fall of rock climbers. Suppose one end of a rope with unstretched length ##l## is anchored to a cliff and a climber of mass m is attached to the other end. Ehrm the climber is a height ##l## above the anchor point, he slips and falls under the influence of gravity for a distance ##2l##, after which the rope becomes taut and stretches a distance ##x## as it stops the climber. Assume a stretchy rope behaves as a spring with spring constant ##k##.
(a) Applying the work-energy principle, show that
$$x=\frac{mg}{k}\left[1+\sqrt{1+\frac{4kl}{mg}}\right]$$

Homework Equations


$$U_{GPE}=mgh$$
$$K=\frac{1}{2}mv^2$$
$$U_{spring}=\frac{1}{2}kx^2$$
$$F_{spring}=|kx|$$
$$W=ΔK$$

The Attempt at a Solution


Before the climber falls

##U_{GPE}=mg(2l+x)## and ##U_{spring}=0##

After the climber has reached maximum displacement

##U_{GPE}=0## and ##U_{spring}=\frac{1}{2}kx^2##

Therefore ##mg(2l+x)=\frac{1}{2}kx^2##

I feel that this is incorrect because I am not using the work-energy principle, but what is the relevance if the kinetic energies at the beginning and end of the fall are zero? Should I split this problem into two parts where ##\frac{1}{2}mv^2=mg(2l)## at the point when the rope begins to stretch and then work from there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've done alright. You've used the work-energy principle to convert the GPE into the work done by gravity resulting in KE of the climber. You didn't, for example, use kinematic equations and the acceleration due to gravity to find the speed, then determine the KE from that.

Just solve your equation for x.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top