Fan Speed and Electricity Consumed

AI Thread Summary
Ceiling fans consume more electricity at higher speeds due to the increased torque required, which scales with the square of the speed. As fan speed increases, it moves more air and requires greater energy to accelerate the mass of air. While some discussions suggest that the current drawn is the same across speeds, this is misleading; reducing speed does decrease power usage. Effective speed controllers, particularly those using transformers, minimize power loss at various settings. Overall, operating a fan at lower speeds results in lower energy consumption compared to running it at full speed.
sanchitgangwa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Does a ceiling fan consume more electicity at higher speeds or is the same at all speeds?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Current drawn by an electric motor is roughly proportional to the torque. And for a fan, torque is going to scale roughly as a square of the speed. So yes, at higher fan speed, it will draw more power.
 
Another way of looking at it: the fan moves more air at higher settings, and moves it faster. Greater mass undergoing greater acceleration, means more enegry is being used.
 
Somewhere I read that the current drawn is the same but the current which reaches the motor is different. Does this mean there is no effect on power usage if I reduce the fan's speed?
 
Last edited:
sanchitgangwa said:
Somewhere I read that the current drawn is the same but the current which reaches the motor is different. Does this mean there is no effect on power usage if I reduce the fan's speed?
That would be a terrible way to build a speed controller. It would mean that at any setting other than full, power is being completely wasted.

Since a typical household fan will run on AC power, best speed controller will be one using a transformer. In that case, the power loss will be very small at all settings. Another way is using resistors. That would work for both AC and DC, but it would result in higher power losses, especially at low settings. Still, the power drawn at low settings will be lower than at full speed even in this case.
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...

Similar threads

Back
Top