A Fatigue stress concentration factor (Kf)

AI Thread Summary
The fatigue stress concentration factor (Kf) is lower than the geometric stress concentration factor (Kt) due to the material's behavior under cyclic loading, where ductility plays a significant role. Kt assumes a perfectly elastic and brittle material, while Kf accounts for the real-world ductility that reduces peak stress at notches. In static loading scenarios for ductile materials, Kt is not typically computed, but it is relevant for fatigue analysis since failure can occur before reaching the yield point. The reduction in Kf compared to Kt is influenced by the material's notch sensitivity, which can be researched further. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurate fatigue analysis in engineering applications.
kajalschopra
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I had been reading about the fatigue stress concentration factor (Kf) which is reduced compared to the geometric stress concentration factor (Kt). The reduction in turn dpends upon the material's sensitivity to notches.

https://moodlearn.ariel.ac.il/pluginfile.php/456050/mod_resource/content/0/Stress-consentration.pdf

I'm not able to sense why the fatigue stress concentration factor (Kf) is reduced compared to the geometric stress concentration factor (Kt).

What is the reason?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simplified explanation: Kt assumes a perfectly elastic perfectly brittle material. In the real world, most materials have at least a little ductility, if only on a microscopic scale. That ductility reduces the stress at the point of peak stress.
 
Simplified explanation: Kt assumes a perfectly elastic perfectly brittle material. In the real world, most materials have at least a little ductility, if only on a microscopic scale. That ductility reduces the stress at the point of peak stress.

I know. Also, for static loading for ductile materials we do not compute kt. The question is for fatigue we do compute kt because failure in fatigue can be anticipated before material reaches elastic limit / yield point.

Why kf is lesser than kt ? Ductility has no role to play in the reduction of kf than kt.
 
Google is your friend. Use search terms fatigue notch sensitivity.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top