FBD representing a bird feeder.

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsdude123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bird Fbd
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the forces acting on a birdfeeder with a bird perched on it. The key forces include the tension in the wire, the weight of the feeder, and the normal force exerted by the bird on the feeder. It clarifies that the weight of the bird is a gravitational force acting on the bird itself, not on the feeder. In the free-body diagram for the feeder, the normal force from the bird is included, while the bird's weight is not. Understanding this distinction is crucial for accurately representing the forces in the diagram.
physicsdude123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A bird sits in a birdfeeder suspended from a tree by a wire, as shown in the diagram below.
Let WB and WF be the weight of the bird and the feeder respectively. Let T be the tension in the wire and N be the normal force between the bird and the feeder. Which of the following free-body diagrams best represents the birdfeeder? (The force vectors are not drawn to scale and are only meant to show the direction, not the magnitude, of each force.)

The image and possible solutions are shown here: http://i48.tinypic.com/5zirzp.png


Homework Equations



None, its a conceptual question.

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand that there must be a force of tension and the weight of the feeder that acts on the birdfeeder. The correct answer is (e) in the picture provided... whereas I thought it was (f). I was just wondering if anyone can clarify the distinction between the N force and W{B} force and why it is the N force that must be considered rather than weight of the bird.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, Physicsdude123. Welcome to PF!

The "weight" of the bird is the force of gravity that acts on the bird. It is a force that the Earth mysteriously exerts on the bird through empty space ("action at a distance"). So, the weight of the bird is a force acting on the bird, not on the feeder.

The bird happens to be in direct contact with the feeder. So, the bird exerts a "contact force" on the feeder where part of the surface of the bird presses on part of the surface of the feeder. This force is called a "normal" force since it acts perpendicularly to the surfaces in contact.

Now, it might happen in a particular situation that the magnitude of the normal force that the bird exerts on the feeder equals the magnitude of the force that the Earth exerts on the bird. But, even so, the weight of the bird and the normal force that the bird exerts on the feeder are distinct forces. When drawing the free-body diagram of the feeder, you would include the normal force that the bird exerts on the feeder but you would not include the force that the Earth exerts on the bird (i.e., the weight of the bird).
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top