Before I had learned about the Maxwell-Bolzmann distribution for the gases, I thought it is a kind of subject where we could have only bad models that somehow predict location of the peak of energy distribution, and comparing the model to the actual measured distributions would be like "bump here and bump there, they about in the same place so it is good model!", but as it turned out it's not like this. The measured distribution has precisly the same shape (meaning that the difference doesn't show in a figures of reasonable accury), which is very impressing.
I don't have the Kittel's book right here, but I remeber reading it, and it explained how the Pauli principle was used to explain behaviour of the electrons in solid, and how most of the electrons cannot get onto higher energy levels because only those near the fermi surface are mobile. However, the electron gas assumption, where we assume that the electrons are not interacting, sounds very strange because aren't the interacting quite strongly in reality? To me, this model of electrons in solid sounds very qualitative. I'm now interested to know, if the Fermi statistics has been verified by experiment equally convincingly as the Boltzmann statistic has been. Or is it giving merely qualitative explanations?