Fermilab relativity energy problem

AI Thread Summary
Fermilab's approach to high-energy physics has evolved from fixed target experiments to colliders to maximize energy in particle collisions. The discussion centers on calculating the energy of the most massive particle produced in collisions involving a 1000 GeV proton beam and a stationary proton. It highlights the significant difference in energy outcomes between fixed target collisions and head-on collisions of equal energy beams. The participant expresses confusion about the correct method for calculating total energy, indicating a need for clearer explanation of their thought process. Understanding relativistic energy and momentum conservation is crucial for solving these problems accurately.
erisedk
Messages
372
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


This is why we build them as colliders now:

Some years ago Fermilab used to extract its high energy proton beam for use by "fixed target" experiments situated at the ends of external beamlines a mile north of the Tevatron ring. The energy available for the production of (unstable) heavy particles in collisions between a high energy proton and a stationary proton is very different from that available when two beams with the full Tevatron energy collide head on.

Calculate the energy of the most massive single particle that can be produced in a collision of a proton with total energy 1000 GeV with a stationary proton with total energy mc^2 = 0.93827 GeV. Also calculate the energy of the most massive particle that can be produced in a head on collison of two 1000GeV beams. (It's fine to use the approximation β = 1 when appropriate).

Homework Equations


Relativistic energy and momentum conservation

The Attempt at a Solution


Why do I feel like I should just be adding the two terms to get total energy of final particle in both cases? Answer is obviously wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your relevant equations and attempt at a solution show little detail. Perhaps if you explained what you did and why it is obviously wrong, someone would be able to divine why you feel the way you do.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top