Fermions and Bosons in a distribution

ZedCar
Messages
353
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Consider a system of N distinguishable particles which are distributed across levels with energies 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5... The total energy of the system is U. Determine all the possible combinations of the particles in this system and hence determine the total number of microstates of the system.

N = 5
U = 3

The distributions are as follows:

state 0 1 2 3

4 0 0 1 Statistical weight=5, Fermions=0, Bosons=1
3 1 1 0 Statistical weight=20, Fermions=0, Bosons=1
2 3 0 0 Statistical weight=10, Fermions=0, Bosons=1


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I understand the distributions and the statistical weight calculations.

Though how has it been determined that the Fermions in each distributions =0 and the Bosons=1 in each distribution?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If we consider another system.

N = 2
U = 8

The distributions are as follows:

state 0 1 2 3 5 6 7 8

100000001 Statistical weight = 2, Fermions = 1, Bosons = 1
010000010 Statistical weight = 2, Fermions = 1, Bosons = 1
001000100 Statistical weight = 2, Fermions = 1, Bosons = 1
000101000 Statistical weight = 2, Fermions = 1, Bosons = 1
000020000 Statistical weight = 1, Fermions = 0, Bosons = 1


Again I understand the configurations in the states 0 to 8, and also the statistical weights. Though again I am unsure as to how the numbers of Fermions and Bosons have been achieved.
 
I think you must be leaving out some pertinent information.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top