Few Questions on source tranformation

AI Thread Summary
When different voltage sources are in series, the resultant voltage is the sum of the sources, considering their polarities, rather than simply picking the smaller one. The initial conversion of 1A and 2 ohms to 2V is incorrect as the resistance does not disappear; the solution likely mislabels a resistor. The confusion regarding the disappearance of resistance arises from the parallel configuration of resistors, which can be replaced by an equivalent resistance. The discussion highlights the importance of proper labeling and understanding circuit configurations. The thread suggests a need for relocation to the homework sub-forum for better assistance.
clurt
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
It's question 1b) Please view attached

image.jpg
image.jpg


1. Just to clarify, when different voltage sources are in series you pick the smaller one?

2. First step, they turned the 1A and 2ohm into 2V, why does the resistance disappear? Then between the last two steps the 12/7 ohm resistance remains with 18/7 voltage. Why does one resistance disappear while the other doesn't?

Thanks on advance
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
clurt said:
It's question 1b) Please view attached
It would have been better if you'd cropped the attachment to just the relevant block in post #1 and in the process made it more legible.

1. Just to clarify, when different voltage sources are in series you pick the smaller one?
No! The 3v comes about because two sources are in series, +6v and -3v, so the resultant voltage is their sum with polarities taken into account.

2. First step, they turned the 1A and 2ohm into 2V, why does the resistance disappear?
It doesn't. The solution is in error. I expect the right side 2 ohm was probably intended to be labelled 4 ohms.

Then between the last two steps the 12/7 ohm resistance remains with 18/7 voltage. Why does one resistance disappear while the other doesn't?
Nothing disappears. The two resistors are in parallel, so they can be replaced by an equivalent one of the value equal to that when two resistors are in parallel.

Hope that helps.
 
Last edited:
This thread belongs in the homework sub-forum. You almost certainly would have received prompt assistance had you listed it there.

Could a mentor kindly move this to the appropriate forum ...
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top