Field resulting from line charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field E at the origin due to a continuous line charge along the x-axis with uniform linear charge density λ₀. The integration approach involves evaluating E using the formula E = ∫(kλ₀)/(x²) dx from x₀ to infinity, leading to the result E = kλ₀/(2x₀). There are concerns about the website's latex formatting not displaying correctly in the preview, which complicates verifying the solution before posting. Additionally, a user clarifies the integration process involving an elemental charge dq and confirms the correctness of the approach. The conversation emphasizes both the mathematical solution and the challenges of using the forum's formatting tools.
DFWDraco76
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A continuous line of charge lies along the x axis, extending from -x_{0}{ to -\infty. The line carries a uniform linear charge density \lambda_{0}. What is E, the magnitude of the electric field, at the origin?

Use the symbols \lambda_{0}, x_{0} and k (for the Coulomb constant) to enter your answer.

Ok so I'm 99% sure I've got the correct answer, but for some reason the *#!$ website we have to use to enter the answers is not accepting it. So before I blow a gasket over it I wanted to make sure the answer is correct.

Since we're looking for the magnitude of the field it's easier for me to flip it over to the +x axis.

Basically it comes down to integrating E =
\int_x_{0}^\infty \frac{k\lambda_{0}}{(x=x_{0})^2, which, if I've done it correctly, comes to \frac{k\lambda_{0}}{2x_{0}}.

Ah I can't get the latex right. integral from x_not to infinity of (k lambda_not) / (x_not + x)^2 dx.

Is that correct?

----

On a side note - I'm new to the site and am still learning how to use latex. why is it that when you click "preview post" you can't see the result of the latex code? Unless I'm missing something, I have to actually post before I can see if I've made a mistake. Is that right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't see your TeX...so I'll just describe the correct way of solving this. The answer seems correct by the way.

Consider an elemental charge dq at a distance x from the origin. Clearly dq=\lambda dx. The field due to this dq is directed towards the +x axis (assuming its all positve charge) and is given by

dE = \frac{k \lambda dx}{x^2}

Now all you have to do is integrate from x=-x_{0} to x=-\infty. This is probably what you did...I just threw in the solution just in case you have a doubt.

Cheers
Vivek
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top