Field strength between two wires

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating electric field strengths between conductors in various scenarios. For part (a), the electric field strength between two wires in a 230V power line is calculated to be 162 kV/m, which is correct. In part (b), the distance for a spark to jump at 16 kV is determined to be 16 mm, although there is confusion regarding the relevance of a 270 mm safety rule. Part (c) involves calculating the distance for a spark to jump from a damaged coffee machine conductor, yielding a result of 0.23 mm based on the peak voltage of 325V. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding electric fields and safety distances in electrical engineering contexts.
Maria H
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I feel like a stupied girl. :(
It think it's not very hard, but I have to have the correct answear before i send it to my school.

Homework Statement



We sometimes exposed to electric fields. To determine whether there is a risk of flashover is a rule of thumb which states that the sparks will switch if it is larger than the field strength of 1kV per mm, ie 1MV/m.

a) How big is the largest electric field between two leaders in a 230V-power line (peak voltage is 324V)? We assume that the distance between conductors is 2mm. Reply with a rounded integer. Answear in kV/m

b) If a person stands on a railway-wagon, an accident can happen if you come too close to the lead. If the voltage is 16kV, at which distance can a spark jump over and kill a person? The authority has a rules that says 270mm between the leaders at that voltage. Then you have gardening has objected to the management of moist air, etc.. Reply with a rounded integer.

c) If the insulation around a conductor to a coffee machine is damaged, at what distance from the leader can get a spark to turn over to a sink? Reply with two decimal places.

Homework Equations



E=U/d

The Attempt at a Solution



a) 324/0.002 =162000 =162kV/m I'm pretty right here :/

b) 16kV/1(kV/mm) = 16 mm
16mm according to the rule of thumb 1kV per mm. I don't see how I should take the rule of 270mm into considiration. It's obvioulsy a better distans..

c) 0.230V/1(kV/mm) = 0.23mm

Cheers/Maria
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(a) and (b) look good, though I don't understand the remark that "gardening has objected to the management of moist air, etc.." I have no idea what that means or how it enters into question (b).

For (c), if it's a 230 V line then the peak voltage is actually 325V. Otherwise, you have the right idea.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top