Find Acceleration of m_1 & m_2 in Frictionless Pulley System

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackwing1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Pulleys
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of two masses, m_1 and m_2, in a frictionless pulley system with a specified moment of inertia and radius. Participants clarify the roles of tensions T1 and T2, debating their effects on the direction of torque and acceleration. The confusion arises from the assignment of positive and negative values to the tensions based on their rotational directions, with T1 and T2 being redefined for consistency. Ultimately, it is established that T1 applies counterclockwise torque while T2 applies clockwise torque, emphasizing the importance of understanding tension as both an upward and downward force on the pulley. The conversation highlights the need for clear definitions and consistent notation in solving physics problems.
blackwing1
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A pulley has a moment of inertia of 5.0 kg*m^2 and a radius of 0.5m. The cord supporting the masses m_1 and m_2 does not slip, and the axle is frictionless. Find the acceleration of each mass when m_1 = 2.0 kg and m_2 = 5.0 kg.


Homework Equations


F=ma, Fr=I(alpha)


The Attempt at a Solution


My work is attached in the image. The thing that appears or be wrong is that T_2 - T_1 = Ia/r^2, not -Ia/r^2. However, I can't figure out why it shouldn't be negative, as the tangential acceleration for the pulley should be negative, as it is the same as the acceleration downwards, which is negative.
 

Attachments

  • CCF20110731_00000.jpg
    CCF20110731_00000.jpg
    13.5 KB · Views: 684
Physics news on Phys.org
Torque=I*aangular so (T2+(-T1))=I*alinear/r^2

Since It's T2+(-T1), not the other way around, you're taking a tension that goes in the counterclockwise direction and adding a tension that goes in the clockwise direction. When adding these tensions/torques to find the net torque, you have defined the counterclockwise direction as positive. It follows logically that if T2 is larger, you'll get a positive aangular and that the pulley will spin in a counterclockwise direction (The net torque will be in the counterclockwise direction). Otherwise, if T1 is greater, you'll get a negative aangular that will rotate in the clockwise direction. By choosing T2 as the positive tension, you made a counterclockwise rotation positive because T2 acts on the pulley in the counterclockwise direction.

While a counterclockwise aangular may rotation "down" on the left, it rotates "up" on the right, so you can't call it negative or positive based on the linear positive and negative directions. Hope that helps
 
Last edited:
Thanks for answering.
Well, the equation you gave (T1-T2 = Ia/r^2) is the same as the one I got, just multiplied by -1 on both sides (T2-T1 = -Ia/r^2). In your case, you are designating T2 as negative and thus counterclockwise. Shouldn't the acceleration still be negative then?

As for the tensions, shouldn't T2 be the one that's pulling counterclockwise, as it is pulling m2 up, and T1 be clockwise, as it is pulling m1 up?

Thanks.
 
Oh, my bad, I was a little inconsistent with our definitions of T1 and T2. For mine, I mean T1 to be the counterclockwise tension above the mass that is going to fall. In other words, I would have written:

T1-m1g=-m1a, instead of T2-m2g=-m2g

To make our posts consistent, I'll switch T1 with T2 and vice versa, then you can re-read it and hopefully it'll make more sense, sorry!

With the definition changes you are right, T2 pulls counterclockwise and T1 pulls clockwise, if the falling mass and T2 are on the left.
 
No, you were right. Let me rephrase that.

Let m1 be the mass on the left, and m2 the mass on the right. Let T1 be the tension holding up m1 and T2 be the tension holding up m2. So would T1 also be the force that applies the counterclockwise torque, and T2 the clockwise torque?

I always thought that the T2 applied the counterclockwise torque because it is the result of m1g.
 
T1 is on the left, T2 on the right.

T1 applies the counterclockwise torque to the pulley, and T2 applies the clockwise torque to the pulley. You can think of it like this, the rope transmits a particular force (What we call tension) from the mass to the pulley and vice versa. Because of Newton's Third Law, the rope is pulling up on the mass just as much as the mass is pulling down on the rope (The rope is also going down with the mass, so you can't say the mass is pulling down on the rope with force of mg). The rope transmits this tension onto the pulley and pushes the pulley down by this tension, and the pulley pulls up on the rope. In the end, the rope is pushing DOWN on the pulley with the tension. So, T2 is facing downward, and thus applies a clockwise torque.

In other words, you are thinking about the tension only as an "upward" force. Think of it also pushing down on the pulley. Hopefully the diagram with help from wikipedia: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/Tension_figure.svg

Just pretend the scaffold is the pulley. You'll notice a downward force/tension "on scaffold by rope". This is the torque.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top