Find angle at which the projectile hits

  • Thread starter Thread starter CollegeStudent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Projectile
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a projectile motion scenario where a stone is thrown horizontally from a cliff. The objective is to determine the time it takes for the stone to hit the water, as well as the speed and angle of impact upon striking the water.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using kinematic equations to find the time of flight and horizontal distance traveled. There is confusion regarding how to calculate the angle of impact, particularly in relation to the horizontal launch and vertical drop.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided hints and alternative approaches to finding the angle of impact, suggesting the use of velocity components at the moment of impact. There is ongoing exploration of different methods to arrive at the angle, with no clear consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of ensuring that the units for distance and velocity are consistent when calculating components. There is also mention of the potential for different interpretations of the projectile's motion and the calculations involved.

CollegeStudent
Messages
109
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A kid stands at the edge of a cliff and throws a stone horizontally over the edge with a speed of 16.6 m/s. The cliff is 48.8 m above the ocean. How long after being released does the stone strike the water? With what speed and angle of impact does it hit the water?


Homework Equations


y = V_oy * t + 1/2 * g * t²
x = v_ox * t

The Attempt at a Solution


Well to find the time I just used the first equation...plugged in -48.8 m for y, initial velocity in the y direction is 0...g is going to be -9.8 here...and finally t²

So t² = -48.8 / -4.9 ...and t ≈3.2 seconds

Now for the distance I used the second equation...plugged 16.6 in for V_ox and the 3.2 for t
which came out to ≈ 52.4m

But the angle part is confusing me...how do I figure out the angle? I know that i would normally use the y components and x components...but I don't have an angle because the stone was thrown horizontally... am I supposed to use the cliff 48.8sin(90) for the y component (no x component there)...and use 16.6cos(0) for the x component? (no y component there)...So would the answer be inverse tangent (48.8/16.6) = ≈71°?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: 48.8 meters is a distance, 16.6 is a velocity, and you want the relevant x and y components to be in the same units. And it doesn't matter that the stone was thrown horizontally, you're concerned some that's happening at the time when it hits the water.
 
bossman27 said:
Hint: 48.8 meters is a distance, 16.6 is a velocity, and you want the relevant x and y components to be in the same units. And it doesn't matter that the stone was thrown horizontally, you're concerned some that's happening at the time when it hits the water.

Hmm. that actually confused me more haha. i get what you mean...the cliff height is m and velocity is m/s...So then I can't use the cliff...okay

Well I can't only use the projectile component can I? because there is no y component of it...with sin of 0 it would be 0...I know I have the time right because it checkes out with the height of the cliff...the distance I'm pretty sure I have right V_ox * t...Perhaps another hint? I feel like it's something so incredibly obvious I'm going to hate myself for not realizing it.
 
Haha, alright. Think about finding a slope first rather than an angle first. What you want is \frac{dy}{dt} and \frac{dx}{dt} when it hits the water. The downward velocity and the horizontal velocity when it hits the water are components of its total velocity. Turn this into a triangle and then solve for the angle that way. And it always helps to draw a picture.
 
I don't know but ignore my answer OP, and correct me if i got it wrong helpers.
Vx = 16.6m/s

Vy = Vinitial + gt
Vy = 0 + gt = 9.81m/s(3.2s)

tan(theta) = Vy/Vx = 31.392/16.6
theta = 62.13

Vresult^2 = 31.392^2 + 16.6^2
Vresult = 35.51
 
Equilibrium said:
I don't know but ignore my answer OP, and correct me if i got it wrong helpers.
Vx = 16.6m/s

Vy = Vinitial + gt
Vy = 0 + gt = 9.81m/s(3.2s)

tan(theta) = Vy/Vx = 31.392/16.6
theta = 62.13

Vresult^2 = 31.392^2 + 16.6^2
Vresult = 35.51

Well what I was thinking was...using the first equation again

y = V_oy * t + 1/2 * g * t²

and assume I don't know the time yet

48.8 = 0 + 1/2 (9.8) (t)²

t = √((48.8/9.8)/2)

which WOULD comfirm my time of ≈3.2 seconds

Now since that's ONLY in the y direction...shouldn't the velocity = acceleration * time?

So 9.8 ( 3.2 ) = 31.36 would be my Vy

so now

tanθ Vy/Vx = 62.11°

and the speed would be √(31.36² + 16.6²)

which comes out to 35.1 m/s


Our answers are a bit off from each other...anyone out there that can tell us who was in the right direction?
 
With the precision both computations are done, the last digit BEFORE the decimal is already off in both computations, so it is meaningless to compare the less significant digits. If that sort of precision is OK, then both computations are correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K