Find Bohr Radius from Approximate Potential Energy

Mattszo
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine an expression for the Bohr radius (a_{0} from the following approximation. The electron moves to the nucleus to lower its potential energy,

V(r) = -\frac{e^{2}}{r}

If the electron is in domain 0\leqr\leq\bar{r}, then we may write Δp≈\frac{\hbar}{\bar{r}}, with corresponding kinetic energy \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m\bar{r}^{2}}. With this information estimate a_{0} (Bohr radius) by minimizing the total energy.

Homework Equations



Uncertainty ΔpΔx≈\frac{\hbar}{2}
\bar{r} is the Mean of r -------> (I think)
\hat{H}\varphi_{n}=E_{n}\varphi_{n} or with x-hat and x
For an electron moving with momentum p 2\pirp=nh
E = K.E + V(x)
[\hat{A}, \hat{B}]=\hat{A}\hat{B}-\hat{B}\hat{A}
[\hat{A}, \hat{B}]=0 if they they commute
[\hat{x}, \hat{p}]=i\hbar
And I have no idea where this equation came from but I found it in the book and used it for my solution:
\frac{e^{2}}{r}=\frac{p^{2}_{\vartheta}}{mr^{2}}=\frac{n^{2}\hbar^{2}}{mr^{2}} where e is the electric charge of the electron and p_{\vartheta}=mr^{2}\dot{\vartheta}

The Attempt at a Solution

E = \frac{p^{2}_{\vartheta}}{2m\bar{r}^{2}}-\frac{e^{2}}{\bar{r}} ... i
From the "Centripetal Condition" (The equation I got from the book) (r)\frac{e^{2}}{r^{2}}=(r)\frac{p^{2}_{\vartheta}}{mr^{3}}=\frac{p^{2}_{\vartheta}}{m\bar{r^{2}}} ... ii

sub ii into i

E = -\frac{p^{2}_{\vartheta}}{2m\bar{r}^{2}} ... iii

Now from Centripetal Condition:
r=\frac{n^{2}\hbar^{2}}{me^{2}} where p_{\vartheta}=n\hbar ... iv

Put iv into iii

E = -\frac{p^{2}_{\vartheta}}{2m}(\frac{me^{2}}{n^{2}\hbar^{2}})^{2}=-\frac{me^{4}}{2n^{2}\hbar^{2}} and let ℝ=\frac{m_{e}e^{4}}{2\hbar^{2}}=13.6eV
Then E_{n}=\frac{ℝ}{n^{2}}

So for n=1, which is the lowest possible state of potential energy, E_{1}=13.6eV

and for n=1 from equation iv

r_{1}=a_{0}=\frac{n^{2}\hbar^{2}}{me^{2}}=5.24x10^{-9}cm=Bohr's radius

The problem is this was too straightforward and simple. I did not correctly use the mean value of \bar{r}, because it is a function and I am to find an expression for the Bohr radius.
I used very little of the information provided.
Also I just assumed the lowest energy state, whereas the question says that the electron just goes to a lower energy state.
Also this question is in the chapter where they define the commutator relationships and compatible operators, and really the whole chapter is about that. I find it fishy the solution I provided doesn't use any of that chapters material.I need a new approach to this problem and am out of ideas. Please help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


The idea here is that the electron is confined to a region of size ##\bar{r}##, so applying the uncertainty principle gives you an estimate of the magnitude of its momentum, namely ##p \approx \hbar/\bar{r}##, and therefore of its kinetic energy. The total energy of the electron is thus given as a function of ##\bar{r}## by
$$E(\bar{r}) = \frac{\hbar^2}{2m\bar{r}^2} - \frac{e^2}{\bar{r}}.$$ The problem is simply asking you to find the value of ##\bar{r}## for which the total energy of the electron is minimized.
 


I see it now, thank you!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top